KMB vs. KO
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and KO (The Coca-Cola Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — KMB in Household & Personal Products, KO in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic. Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 2.06%/yr vs 10.53%/yr for KO. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KMB vs. KO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 13.49% return, which is significantly lower than KO's 25.47% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed KO with an annualized return of 2.06%, while KO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.53% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- 3.73%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- 6M
- 13.62%
- YTD
- 13.49%
- 1Y
- -12.10%
- 3Y*
- -0.48%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 2.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.95%
KO
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 14.08%
- YTD
- 25.47%
- 1Y
- 29.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $449.61M | $431.76M | $467.83M | |
| $1.60B | $1.48B | $1.47B |
KMB vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 13.49% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 25.47% | 15.60% | 8.88% | -4.43% | 10.61% | 11.37% | 2.47% | 20.60% | 6.77% | 14.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and KO is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984 | 0.39 |
The correlation between KMB and KO shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KMB:
$37.03B
KO:
$372.43B
KMB:
$5.87
KO:
$3.32
KMB:
19.02
KO:
26.08
KMB:
3.29
KO:
3.15
KMB:
2.24
KO:
7.45
KMB:
21.25
KO:
10.33
KMB:
$16.57B
KO:
$50.13B
KMB:
$6.08B
KO:
$31.02B
KMB:
$3.05B
KO:
$19.57B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
KO
KMB vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.29 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 3.71 | -4.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 8.08 | -8.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum KO drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and KO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -68.23% | +31.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -7.87% | -21.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -15.50% | -18.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -17.27% | -16.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -36.99% | +2.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.86% | -2.83% | -17.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -16.06% | +7.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.36% | 3.61% | +16.75% |
Volatility
KMB vs. KO - Volatility Comparison
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a higher volatility of 8.86% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 8.41%. This indicates that KMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.86% | 8.41% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.00% | 14.99% | +4.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.03% | 18.59% | +8.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 16.64% | +4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 18.43% | +2.86% |
Dividends
KMB vs. KO - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than KO's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.55% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 2.40% | 2.92% | 3.12% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.84% | 2.99% | 2.89% | 3.29% | 3.23% | 3.38% | 3.07% |
Financials
KMB vs. KO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and The Coca-Cola Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. KO - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 4.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.3%.
KO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 8.42B and revenue of 13.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.9%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 448.00M and revenue of 4.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
KO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.67B and revenue of 13.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 345.00M and revenue of 4.19B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
KO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 4.43B and revenue of 13.38B, resulting in a net margin of 33.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and KO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (8.86%) compared to KO (8.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs KO's -68.23%.
KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and KO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer