PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMB vs. IREN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KMB vs. IREN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and IREN Limited (IREN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than IREN's 58.25% return.


KMB

1D
0.74%
1M
6.86%
YTD
4.05%
6M
1.77%
1Y
-19.86%
3Y*
-4.95%
5Y*
-0.92%
10Y*
0.95%

IREN

1D
5.40%
1M
8.34%
YTD
58.25%
6M
48.94%
1Y
487.71%
3Y*
155.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMB vs. IREN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
4.05%-19.86%11.79%-7.08%-1.58%7.68%
IREN
IREN Limited
58.25%284.62%37.34%472.00%-92.27%-42.25%

Correlation

The correlation between KMB and IREN is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

-0.03

Fundamentals

EPS

KMB:

$5.93

IREN:

$0.45

PE Ratio

KMB:

17.26

IREN:

131.80

PS Ratio

KMB:

2.06

IREN:

13.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

KMB:

$16.54B

IREN:

$757.07M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KMB:

$5.93B

IREN:

$433.88M

EBITDA (TTM)

KMB:

$3.07B

IREN:

-$173.05M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMB vs. IREN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMB
KMB Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
KMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMB Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
KMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMB Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

IREN
IREN Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IREN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IREN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
IREN Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IREN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IREN Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMB vs. IREN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and IREN Limited (IREN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KMBIRENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.42

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

8.39

-9.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

15.97

-16.99

KMB vs. IREN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMB Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the IREN Sharpe Ratio of 4.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMB and IREN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KMB vs. IREN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum IREN drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and IREN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMBIRENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.97%

-96.21%

+59.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.60%

-58.62%

+29.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.06%

-65.56%

+31.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.52%

-21.78%

-4.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

-65.42%

+56.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.43%

30.74%

-11.31%

Volatility

KMB vs. IREN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 8.42%, while IREN Limited (IREN) has a volatility of 34.10%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IREN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMBIRENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.42%

34.10%

-25.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.67%

75.79%

-59.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.77%

103.25%

-77.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.19%

118.61%

-98.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.07%

118.61%

-97.54%

Dividends

KMB vs. IREN - Dividend Comparison

KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, while IREN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IREN
IREN Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
4.97%5.00%3.72%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%

Financials

KMB vs. IREN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and IREN Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
4.16B
208.24M
(KMB) Total Revenue
(IREN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


KMB and IREN have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IREN has higher volatility (34.10%) compared to KMB (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs IREN's -96.21%.

IREN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.76 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMB and IREN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer