PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMB vs. DOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KMB vs. DOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Dover Corporation (DOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than DOV's 11.89% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed DOV with an annualized return of 0.95%, while DOV has yielded a comparatively higher 16.36% annualized return.


KMB

1D
0.74%
1M
6.86%
YTD
4.05%
6M
1.77%
1Y
-19.86%
3Y*
-4.95%
5Y*
-0.92%
10Y*
0.95%

DOV

1D
-0.50%
1M
1.56%
YTD
11.89%
6M
9.71%
1Y
22.89%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
16.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMB vs. DOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
4.05%-19.86%11.79%-7.08%-1.58%9.66%0.95%24.57%-2.06%9.04%
DOV
Dover Corporation
11.89%5.24%23.35%15.22%-24.34%45.73%11.53%65.80%-11.11%37.68%

Correlation

The correlation between KMB and DOV is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985

0.28

The correlation between KMB and DOV shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KMB:

$34.08B

DOV:

$29.55B

EPS

KMB:

$5.93

DOV:

$8.01

PE Ratio

KMB:

17.26

DOV:

27.14

PEG Ratio

KMB:

2.98

DOV:

1.12

PS Ratio

KMB:

2.06

DOV:

3.61

PB Ratio

KMB:

18.98

DOV:

3.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

KMB:

$16.54B

DOV:

$8.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KMB:

$5.93B

DOV:

$3.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

KMB:

$3.07B

DOV:

$1.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMB vs. DOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMB
KMB Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
KMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMB Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
KMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMB Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

DOV
DOV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMB vs. DOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Dover Corporation (DOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KMBDOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.18

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

1.50

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

3.42

-4.45

KMB vs. DOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMB Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the DOV Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMB and DOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KMB vs. DOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum DOV drawdown of -58.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and DOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMBDOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.97%

-58.22%

+21.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.60%

-15.34%

-14.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.06%

-26.59%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.06%

-35.56%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

-45.24%

+11.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.52%

-6.36%

-20.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

-13.14%

+4.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.43%

6.71%

+12.72%

Volatility

KMB vs. DOV - Volatility Comparison

Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to Dover Corporation (DOV) at 7.17%. This indicates that KMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMBDOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.42%

7.17%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.67%

18.33%

-1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.77%

24.36%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.19%

24.87%

-4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.07%

26.75%

-5.68%

Dividends

KMB vs. DOV - Dividend Comparison

KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than DOV's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DOV
Dover Corporation
0.96%1.06%1.09%1.32%1.48%1.10%1.56%1.68%2.55%1.80%2.30%2.67%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
4.97%5.00%3.72%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%

Financials

KMB vs. DOV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Dover Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
4.16B
2.05B
(KMB) Total Revenue
(DOV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KMB vs. DOV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Dover Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

28.0%30.0%32.0%34.0%36.0%38.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
36.9%
38.9%
Portfolio components
KMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

DOV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dover Corporation reported a gross profit of 798.14M and revenue of 2.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.9%.

KMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.

DOV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dover Corporation reported an operating income of 305.91M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.

KMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.

DOV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dover Corporation reported a net income of 238.43M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KMB and DOV have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMB has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to DOV (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs DOV's -58.22%.

DOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMB and DOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer