PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLXY vs. BETZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KLXY vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KLXY vs. BETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
KLXY
Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF
-0.86%13.69%-6.39%2.48%
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
-13.39%15.75%10.22%0.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLXY achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly higher than BETZ's -13.39% return.


KLXY

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
-0.86%
6M
3.14%
1Y
15.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BETZ

1D
1.71%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
-13.39%
6M
-19.50%
1Y
0.94%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
-9.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KLXY vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLXY has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than BETZ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KLXY vs. BETZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLXY
KLXY Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
KLXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLXY Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
KLXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLXY Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BETZ
BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLXY vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KLXYBETZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

0.04

+0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.88

0.23

+0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.03

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

0.04

+0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.48

0.08

+2.41

KLXY vs. BETZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLXY Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the BETZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLXY and BETZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KLXYBETZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

0.04

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.11

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between KLXY and BETZ is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

KLXY vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison

KLXY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than BETZ's 5.28% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
KLXY
Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF
0.85%0.84%0.74%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
5.28%4.57%0.86%0.00%0.66%0.00%0.28%

Drawdowns

KLXY vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLXY drawdown since its inception was -26.57%, smaller than the maximum BETZ drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLXY and BETZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KLXYBETZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.57%

-60.82%

+34.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.06%

-29.20%

+15.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-41.41%

+38.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.13%

-33.65%

+25.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

14.15%

-10.08%

Volatility

KLXY vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kraneshares Global Luxury Index ETF (KLXY) is 3.97%, while Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that KLXY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KLXYBETZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

8.24%

-4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

15.73%

-2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.28%

23.04%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.80%

27.26%

-6.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.80%

28.13%

-7.33%