PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLAC vs. MKA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KLAC vs. MKA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KLA Corporation (KLAC) and Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

KLAC is traded in USD, while MKA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MKA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLAC achieves a 110.02% return, which is significantly higher than MKA.L's -8.16% return.


KLAC

1D
5.55%
1M
37.79%
YTD
110.02%
6M
113.75%
1Y
192.78%
3Y*
75.88%
5Y*
52.93%
10Y*
45.08%

MKA.L

1D
1.98%
1M
-5.57%
YTD
-8.16%
6M
-17.32%
1Y
155.84%
3Y*
60.60%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLAC vs. MKA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KLAC
KLA Corporation
110.02%94.48%9.36%56.05%-11.20%68.05%47.94%103.99%-12.49%36.80%
MKA.L
Mkango Resources Ltd
-8.16%529.04%-32.02%-1.17%-64.71%75.54%109.72%4.01%11.91%144.31%

Correlation

The correlation between KLAC and MKA.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2016

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KLAC:

$33.62B

MKA.L:

£149.39M

EPS

KLAC:

$35.29

MKA.L:

-$0.04

PS Ratio

KLAC:

2.57

MKA.L:

3.72K

Total Revenue (TTM)

KLAC:

$13.10B

MKA.L:

$50.78K

Gross Profit (TTM)

KLAC:

$8.09B

MKA.L:

-$544.15K

EBITDA (TTM)

KLAC:

$5.77B

MKA.L:

-$17.87M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KLAC vs. MKA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLAC
KLAC Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KLAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLAC Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KLAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLAC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

MKA.L
MKA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MKA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MKA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLAC vs. MKA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KLA Corporation (KLAC) and Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KLACMKA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.29

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.66

3.00

+5.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.54

6.16

+21.38

KLAC vs. MKA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLAC Sharpe Ratio is 3.93, which is higher than the MKA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLAC and MKA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KLAC vs. MKA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLAC drawdown since its inception was -83.74%, smaller than the maximum MKA.L drawdown of -89.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLAC and MKA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLACMKA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.74%

-89.22%

+5.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.41%

-51.55%

+29.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.95%

-66.46%

+31.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.28%

-89.22%

+48.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.28%

-89.22%

+48.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-37.46%

+37.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.32%

-45.43%

+16.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.03%

25.19%

-18.16%

Volatility

KLAC vs. MKA.L - Volatility Comparison

KLA Corporation (KLAC) and Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L) have volatilities of 22.17% and 22.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLACMKA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.17%

22.41%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.02%

48.66%

-6.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.38%

94.99%

-45.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.88%

77.90%

-34.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.86%

96.82%

-54.96%

Dividends

KLAC vs. MKA.L - Dividend Comparison

KLAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, while MKA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KLAC
KLA Corporation
0.31%0.61%0.96%0.92%1.25%0.91%1.35%1.74%3.17%2.15%2.67%2.94%
MKA.L
Mkango Resources Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

KLAC vs. MKA.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KLA Corporation and Mkango Resources Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
3.42B
50.78K
(KLAC) Total Revenue
(MKA.L) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


KLAC and MKA.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KLAC and MKA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer