KLAC vs. JNJ
KLAC (KLA Corporation) and JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) are both stocks. KLAC operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while JNJ operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, KLAC returned 41.50%/yr vs 10.10%/yr for JNJ. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KLAC vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KLAC achieves a 71.29% return, which is significantly higher than JNJ's 21.57% return. Over the past 10 years, KLAC has outperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 41.50%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.10% annualized return.
KLAC
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -20.02%
- 6M
- 32.75%
- YTD
- 71.29%
- 1Y
- 124.39%
- 3Y*
- 66.84%
- 5Y*
- 47.12%
- 10Y*
- 41.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 22.94%
JNJ
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 8.95%
- 6M
- 15.06%
- YTD
- 21.57%
- 1Y
- 55.80%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.23%
KLAC vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLAC KLA Corporation | 71.29% | 94.48% | 9.36% | 56.05% | -11.20% | 68.05% | 47.94% | 103.99% | -12.49% | 36.80% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 21.57% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between KLAC and JNJ is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.16 |
The correlation between KLAC and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KLAC:
$271.18B
JNJ:
$598.96B
KLAC:
$35.32
JNJ:
$8.63
KLAC:
5.88
JNJ:
28.83
KLAC:
0.22
JNJ:
0.96
KLAC:
2.10
JNJ:
6.29
KLAC:
4.70
JNJ:
7.49
KLAC:
$13.10B
JNJ:
$96.36B
KLAC:
$8.09B
JNJ:
$66.60B
KLAC:
$5.77B
JNJ:
$31.62B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLAC vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank
KLAC
JNJ
KLAC vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KLA Corporation (KLAC) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KLAC | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.53 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.01 | 5.12 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.67 | 14.40 | -0.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KLAC vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLAC drawdown since its inception was -83.74%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLAC and JNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLAC | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.74% | -50.67% | -33.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.19% | -10.96% | -20.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.95% | -15.95% | -19.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.28% | -18.41% | -21.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.28% | -27.37% | -12.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.19% | -6.89% | -24.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.28% | -11.88% | -17.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.14% | 3.89% | +5.25% |
Volatility
KLAC vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
KLA Corporation (KLAC) has a higher volatility of 30.24% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 9.47%. This indicates that KLAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KLAC | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.24% | 9.47% | +20.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.98% | 14.38% | +35.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.81% | 18.08% | +39.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.80% | 17.34% | +28.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.94% | 18.70% | +24.24% |
Dividends
KLAC vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
KLAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than JNJ's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.11% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
KLAC KLA Corporation | 0.39% | 0.61% | 0.96% | 0.92% | 1.25% | 0.91% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 3.17% | 2.15% | 2.67% | 2.94% |
Financials
KLAC vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KLA Corporation and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KLAC vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison
KLAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, KLA Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.09B and revenue of 3.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.
JNJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.
KLAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, KLA Corporation reported an operating income of 1.41B and revenue of 3.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.2%.
JNJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
KLAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, KLA Corporation reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 3.42B, resulting in a net margin of 35.2%.
JNJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KLAC and JNJ have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KLAC has higher volatility (30.24%) compared to JNJ (9.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KLAC dropped -83.74% vs JNJ's -50.67%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KLAC and JNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer