KJUL vs. QFLR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

KJUL (Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July) and QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KJUL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the iShares Russell 2000 ETF, while QFLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Innovator. KJUL is passively managed, while QFLR is actively managed. Over the past year, KJUL returned 18.90% vs 26.58% for QFLR. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QFLR.

Performance

KJUL vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with KJUL having a 6.53% return and QFLR slightly higher at 6.83%.

KJUL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.84%
• YTD: 6.53%
• 6M: 6.73%
• 1Y: 18.90%
• 3Y*: 11.07%
• 5Y*: 4.93%
• 10Y*: —

QFLR

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 3.24%
• YTD: 6.83%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: 26.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KJUL vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KJUL Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July	6.53%	7.70%	10.20%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	6.83%	17.27%	16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between KJUL and QFLR is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024	0.58

The correlation between KJUL and QFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

KJUL vs. QFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KJUL	QFLR
Industrials	17.5%	2.8%
Technology	16.9%	50.8%
Healthcare	16.5%	3.2%
Financial Services	15.9%	0.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	12.1%
Real Estate	6.2%	-
Energy	6.2%	1.1%
Basic Materials	4.8%	0.0%
Utilities	2.9%	1.5%
Communication Services	2.5%	18.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	9.2%

Return for Risk

KJUL vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KJUL

KJUL Risk / Return Rank: 83
KJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
KJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
KJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 79
KJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
KJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 74
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KJUL vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KJUL	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	2.37	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.54	3.22	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.44	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.54	3.51	+2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.49	14.97	+5.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KJUL vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the QFLR Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KJUL and QFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KJUL	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	2.37	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	1.39	-0.83

Drawdowns

KJUL vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KJUL drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, which is greater than QFLR's maximum drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJUL and QFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	KJUL	QFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.69%	-13.97%	-2.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.42%	-7.61%	+4.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.54%	+0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-2.49%	-1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	1.78%	-0.86%

Volatility

KJUL vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) is 0.55%, while Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a volatility of 2.50%. This indicates that KJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KJUL	QFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.55%	2.50%	-1.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.77%	8.04%	-3.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.99%	11.27%	-3.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.31%	12.61%	-0.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.67%	12.61%	-0.94%

KJUL vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

KJUL vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither KJUL nor QFLR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
KJUL Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KJUL and QFLR in my portfolio?

KJUL and QFLR have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KJUL or QFLR?

QFLR has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to KJUL (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KJUL dropped -16.69% vs QFLR's -13.97%.

Which ETF is better, KJUL or QFLR?

On 1-year performance, QFLR leads with 26.58% vs 18.90% for KJUL. On fees, KJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, KJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KJUL or QFLR?

Over the 1-year period, QFLR has performed better with a 26.58% return vs 18.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KJUL or QFLR?

KJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KJUL or QFLR?

KJUL and QFLR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between KJUL and QFLR?

KJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KJUL and 0.89% for QFLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.