PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KJD vs. KBUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KJD vs. KBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD) and KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KJD achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly higher than KBUF's -11.47% return.


KJD

1D
-4.75%
1M
-6.67%
YTD
1.96%
6M
-6.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KBUF

1D
-2.36%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
-11.47%
6M
-11.63%
1Y
-3.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KJD vs. KBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KJD and KBUF is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KJD vs. KBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KJD

KBUF
KBUF Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
KBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
KBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KJD vs. KBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD) and KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KJD vs. KBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KJDKBUFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.62

0.62

-1.24

Drawdowns

KJD vs. KBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KJD drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, which is greater than KBUF's maximum drawdown of -17.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJD and KBUF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KJDKBUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.17%

-17.01%

-32.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.90%

-16.70%

-15.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.63%

-4.16%

-24.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.50%

Volatility

KJD vs. KBUF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KJDKBUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.90%

13.10%

+49.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.90%

14.35%

+48.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.90%

14.35%

+48.55%

KJD vs. KBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

KJD has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than KBUF's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

KJD vs. KBUF - Dividend Comparison

KJD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.49%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KJD and KBUF have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KBUF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KBUF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KJD.

KBUF has the higher dividend yield at 8.49%, compared with 0.00% for KJD.

KJD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KBUF is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KJD and 0.95% for KBUF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KJD and KBUF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer