KJD vs. CN

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

KJD (KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF) and CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) are both China Equities funds. KJD is actively managed, while CN is passively managed. KJD charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CN.

Performance

KJD vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KJD

• 1D: 2.57%
• 1M: 7.71%
• 6M: -2.89%
• YTD: 1.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KJD vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF	1.45%	-28.21%
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Return for Risk

KJD vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KJD	CN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.25%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KJD	CN	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.33%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.33%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.33%	—	—

KJD vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

KJD has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

KJD vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

Neither KJD nor CN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, KJD or CN?

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KJD or CN?

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KJD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KJD or CN?

KJD and CN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between KJD and CN?

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KJD and 0.50% for CN.