PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KHYB vs. KARS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KHYB vs. KARS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KHYB achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly higher than KARS's 1.34% return.


KHYB

1D
0.05%
1M
0.46%
YTD
2.60%
6M
2.57%
1Y
9.27%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*

KARS

1D
-2.26%
1M
-14.17%
YTD
1.34%
6M
0.16%
1Y
40.75%
3Y*
1.63%
5Y*
-5.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KHYB vs. KARS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KHYB
KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF
2.60%9.59%10.79%3.50%-10.15%-12.32%2.00%8.87%0.45%
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
1.34%46.04%-17.88%-7.85%-39.20%24.11%71.17%34.66%-19.49%

Correlation

The correlation between KHYB and KARS is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018

0.20

The correlation between KHYB and KARS shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KHYB vs. KARS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KHYB
KHYB Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
KHYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KHYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
KHYB Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
KHYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
KHYB Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

KARS
KARS Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
KARS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KARS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
KARS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
KARS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
KARS Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KHYB vs. KARS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KHYBKARSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.26

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

2.20

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.50

8.55

+1.95

KHYB vs. KARS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KHYB Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the KARS Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KHYB and KARS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KHYB vs. KARS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KHYB drawdown since its inception was -33.63%, smaller than the maximum KARS drawdown of -64.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KHYB and KARS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KHYBKARSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.63%

-64.85%

+31.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.97%

-18.57%

+14.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.41%

-47.79%

+42.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-64.85%

+32.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-38.23%

+37.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.64%

-28.34%

+18.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

4.78%

-3.90%

Volatility

KHYB vs. KARS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF (KHYB) is 0.79%, while KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) has a volatility of 11.50%. This indicates that KHYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KARS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KHYBKARSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

11.50%

-10.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.08%

21.38%

-18.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.43%

27.77%

-24.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.33%

30.11%

-23.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.70%

29.41%

-23.71%

KHYB vs. KARS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KHYB has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than KARS's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

KHYB vs. KARS - Dividend Comparison

KHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, more than KARS's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
0.18%0.18%0.78%0.88%1.13%6.73%0.14%1.85%1.38%
KHYB
KraneShares Asia Pacific High Income Bond ETF
8.13%7.59%10.11%15.55%9.67%6.22%4.76%4.86%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


KHYB and KARS have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KARS has higher volatility (11.50%) compared to KHYB (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KHYB dropped -33.63% vs KARS's -64.85%.

On 5-year performance, KHYB leads with 0.19% vs -5.51% for KARS. On fees, KHYB is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, KHYB has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KHYB has performed better with a 0.19% return vs -5.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KHYB is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for KARS.

KHYB has the higher dividend yield at 8.13%, compared with 0.18% for KARS.

KHYB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while KARS is Industrials Equities. KHYB tracks JP Morgan Asia Credit Index Non-Investment Grade Corporate Index., while KARS tracks Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KHYB and 0.72% for KARS.

KHYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KHYB and KARS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer