KGRN vs. XBIL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KGRN (KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF) and XBIL (US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KGRN is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index, while XBIL is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KGRN returned -1.94%/yr vs 4.60%/yr for XBIL. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. KGRN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XBIL.

Performance

KGRN vs. XBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF (XBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGRN achieves a -11.49% return, which is significantly lower than XBIL's 1.57% return.

KGRN

• 1D: -3.11%
• 1M: -11.29%
• YTD: -11.49%
• 6M: -11.71%
• 1Y: -6.11%
• 3Y*: -1.94%
• 5Y*: -11.69%
• 10Y*: —

XBIL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 1.57%
• 6M: 1.67%
• 1Y: 3.82%
• 3Y*: 4.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KGRN vs. XBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF	-11.49%	21.45%	-1.11%	-19.71%
XBIL US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF	1.57%	4.17%	5.16%	4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between KGRN and XBIL is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2023	-0.06

Return for Risk

KGRN vs. XBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KGRN

KGRN Risk / Return Rank: 6
KGRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
KGRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
KGRN Omega Ratio Rank: 6
KGRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
KGRN Martin Ratio Rank: 6

XBIL

XBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
XBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
XBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
XBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 99
XBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
XBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KGRN vs. XBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) and US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF (XBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KGRN	XBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	12.56	-12.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.21	38.47	-38.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	10.10	-9.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.24	64.01	-64.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.55	592.11	-592.66

KGRN vs. XBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KGRN Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the XBIL Sharpe Ratio of 12.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGRN and XBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KGRN vs. XBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGRN drawdown since its inception was -66.24%, which is greater than XBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGRN and XBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	KGRN	XBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.24%	-0.08%	-66.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.91%	-0.06%	-25.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.19%	-0.07%	-42.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.65%	0.00%	-53.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.03%	-0.00%	-34.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.19%	0.01%	+11.18%

Volatility

KGRN vs. XBIL - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF (XBIL) at 0.12%. This indicates that KGRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KGRN	XBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.99%	0.12%	+6.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.19%	0.19%	+16.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.64%	0.31%	+23.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.67%	0.38%	+34.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.83%	0.38%	+32.45%

KGRN vs. XBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

KGRN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XBIL's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

KGRN vs. XBIL - Dividend Comparison

KGRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than XBIL's 3.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF	0.97%	0.85%	1.49%	0.74%	1.98%	0.41%	0.01%	5.88%	2.04%
XBIL US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF	3.76%	4.01%	4.90%	4.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KGRN and XBIL in my portfolio?

KGRN and XBIL have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KGRN or XBIL?

KGRN has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to XBIL (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGRN dropped -66.24% vs XBIL's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, KGRN or XBIL?

On 3-year performance, XBIL leads with 4.60% vs -1.94% for KGRN. On fees, XBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, XBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KGRN or XBIL?

Over the 3-year period, XBIL has performed better with a 4.60% return vs -1.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KGRN or XBIL?

XBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KGRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KGRN or XBIL?

XBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 0.97% for KGRN.

What is the main difference between KGRN and XBIL?

KGRN is categorized as China Equities, while XBIL is Ultrashort Bond. KGRN tracks MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index, while XBIL tracks ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: CICC and US Benchmark Series. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for KGRN and 0.15% for XBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.56 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.