PortfoliosLab logo
XBIL vs. BILS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XBIL and BILS is -0.60. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

XBIL vs. BILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF (XBIL) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

XBIL:

0.27%

BILS:

0.27%

Max Drawdown

XBIL:

0.00%

BILS:

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

XBIL:

0.00%

BILS:

0.00%

Returns By Period


XBIL

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BILS

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XBIL vs. BILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BILS's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

XBIL vs. BILS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBIL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XBIL is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XBIL is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XBIL is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XBIL is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XBIL is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XBIL is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BILS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BILS is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BILS is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BILS is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BILS is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BILS is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BILS is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XBIL vs. BILS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF (XBIL) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

XBIL vs. BILS - Dividend Comparison

XBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, while BILS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023
XBIL
US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF
4.56%0.00%0.00%
BILS
SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XBIL vs. BILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBIL drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum BILS drawdown of -0.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBIL and BILS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

XBIL vs. BILS - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...