PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KGLD vs. QQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KGLD vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGLD achieves a -6.67% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 6.90% return.


KGLD

1D
-1.50%
1M
-1.76%
6M
-18.16%
YTD
-6.67%
1Y
18.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.74%

QQQI

1D
0.68%
1M
-3.08%
6M
5.69%
YTD
6.90%
1Y
17.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.66M$2.33M$2.61M
$341.25M$334.46M$358.36M

KGLD vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KGLD
Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF
-6.67%29.75%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
6.90%11.11%

Correlation

The correlation between KGLD and QQQI is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KGLD vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KGLD
KGLD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
KGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
KGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KGLD vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KGLDQQQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.18

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

1.67

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.63

6.03

-4.39

KGLD vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KGLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGLD and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KGLD vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGLD drawdown since its inception was -28.32%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGLD and QQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KGLDQQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.32%

-20.00%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.32%

-9.61%

-18.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.95%

-5.92%

-21.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-2.27%

-6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.19%

2.67%

+10.52%

Volatility

KGLD vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) have volatilities of 6.32% and 6.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KGLDQQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.32%

6.53%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.14%

13.66%

+10.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.22%

16.35%

+12.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.40%

17.75%

+10.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.40%

17.75%

+10.65%

KGLD vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

KGLD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

KGLD vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

KGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.46%, more than QQQI's 14.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
KGLD
Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF
15.46%4.59%0.00%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
14.38%13.82%12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


KGLD and QQQI have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQI has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to KGLD (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGLD dropped -28.32% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

On 1-year performance, KGLD leads with 18.91% vs 17.94% for QQQI. On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, KGLD has been the lower-risk option at 6.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KGLD has performed better with a 18.91% return vs 17.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KGLD.

KGLD has the higher dividend yield at 15.46%, compared with 14.38% for QQQI.

KGLD is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Neos. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KGLD and 0.68% for QQQI.

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KGLD and QQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer