KGLD vs. QQA

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

KGLD (Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF ) and QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KGLD returned 17.91% vs 24.09% for QQA. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KGLD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QQA.

Performance

KGLD vs. QQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGLD achieves a -7.88% return, which is significantly lower than QQA's 12.08% return.

KGLD

• 1D: -2.53%
• 1M: -5.25%
• 6M: -13.85%
• YTD: -7.88%
• 1Y: 17.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQA

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -0.25%
• 6M: 10.17%
• YTD: 12.08%
• 1Y: 24.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KGLD vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF	-7.88%	29.75%
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	12.08%	11.20%

Correlation

The correlation between KGLD and QQA is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.26

Return for Risk

KGLD vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KGLD

KGLD Risk / Return Rank: 21
KGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
KGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
KGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 24
KGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
KGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 18

QQA

QQA Risk / Return Rank: 67
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 62
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KGLD vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KGLD	QQA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	1.67	-1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.96	2.30	-1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.30	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.64	2.76	-2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.55	11.52	-9.97

KGLD vs. QQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KGLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the QQA Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGLD and QQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KGLD vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGLD drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, which is greater than QQA's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGLD and QQA.

Drawdown Indicators

	KGLD	QQA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.07%	-19.73%	-8.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.07%	-8.76%	-19.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.90%	-2.37%	-25.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.99%	-2.52%	-5.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.56%	2.10%	+9.46%

Volatility

KGLD vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) at 6.49%. This indicates that KGLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KGLD	QQA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.48%	6.49%	+0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.10%	11.99%	+13.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.99%	14.51%	+14.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.78%	18.61%	+10.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.78%	18.61%	+10.17%

KGLD vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

KGLD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

KGLD vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison

KGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.67%, more than QQA's 9.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF	15.67%	4.59%	0.00%
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	9.72%	9.78%	4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KGLD and QQA in my portfolio?

KGLD and QQA have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KGLD or QQA?

KGLD has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to QQA (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGLD dropped -28.07% vs QQA's -19.73%.

Which ETF is better, KGLD or QQA?

On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 24.09% vs 17.91% for KGLD. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QQA has been the lower-risk option at 6.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KGLD or QQA?

Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 24.09% return vs 17.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KGLD or QQA?

QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KGLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KGLD or QQA?

KGLD has the higher dividend yield at 15.67%, compared with 9.72% for QQA.

What is the main difference between KGLD and QQA?

They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KGLD and 0.29% for QQA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.