KGF.L vs. WRB
KGF.L (Kingfisher plc) and WRB (W. R. Berkley Corporation) are both stocks. KGF.L operates in Home Improvement Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while WRB operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, KGF.L returned 1.34%/yr vs 18.85%/yr for WRB. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KGF.L vs. WRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
KGF.L is traded in GBp, while WRB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WRB values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGF.L achieves a -6.44% return, which is significantly lower than WRB's -1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, KGF.L has underperformed WRB with an annualized return of 1.34%, while WRB has yielded a comparatively higher 18.85% annualized return.
KGF.L
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- -6.44%
- 6M
- -6.23%
- 1Y
- 6.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.72%
- 5Y*
- 0.79%
- 10Y*
- 1.34%
WRB
- 1D
- 4.06%
- 1M
- 5.67%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- 4.48%
- 1Y
- -3.03%
- 3Y*
- 21.38%
- 5Y*
- 19.00%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
KGF.L vs. WRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGF.L Kingfisher plc | -6.44% | 31.00% | 6.88% | 8.82% | -26.52% | 29.62% | 24.61% | 10.17% | -36.11% | -0.45% |
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | -1.10% | 14.26% | 29.41% | -4.76% | 49.85% | 28.60% | -5.99% | 38.33% | 12.24% | 0.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGF.L and WRB is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2007 | 0.10 |
The correlation between KGF.L and WRB shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (3 years) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KGF.L:
£0.25
WRB:
$4.45
KGF.L:
11.56
WRB:
15.41
KGF.L:
0.19
WRB:
1.86
KGF.L:
£25.73B
WRB:
$14.71B
KGF.L:
£9.69B
WRB:
$2.91B
KGF.L:
£2.07B
WRB:
$2.37B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGF.L vs. WRB — Risk / Return Rank
KGF.L
WRB
KGF.L vs. WRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingfisher plc (KGF.L) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KGF.L | WRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.00 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | -0.16 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.57 | -0.29 | +0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KGF.L | WRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | -0.13 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.81 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | 0.75 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.60 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
KGF.L vs. WRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGF.L drawdown since its inception was -65.46%, which is greater than WRB's maximum drawdown of -39.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGF.L and WRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGF.L | WRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.46% | -39.05% | -26.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.23% | -19.44% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.39% | -19.44% | -10.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.48% | -32.55% | -9.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.36% | -38.80% | -24.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.04% | -12.30% | -8.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.62% | -9.78% | -10.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.46% | 10.40% | +1.06% |
Volatility
KGF.L vs. WRB - Volatility Comparison
Kingfisher plc (KGF.L) has a higher volatility of 8.27% compared to W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) at 7.64%. This indicates that KGF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGF.L | WRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.27% | 7.64% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.42% | 17.21% | +3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.35% | 22.59% | +6.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.27% | 23.41% | +6.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.79% | 25.15% | +6.64% |
Dividends
KGF.L vs. WRB - Dividend Comparison
KGF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than WRB's 2.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGF.L Kingfisher plc | 4.36% | 3.97% | 4.99% | 5.10% | 5.25% | 3.56% | 0.00% | 4.99% | 5.21% | 3.10% | 2.90% | 3.04% |
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | 2.71% | 2.64% | 2.39% | 2.73% | 1.22% | 2.44% | 0.71% | 2.43% | 2.83% | 2.16% | 2.27% | 0.86% |
Financials
KGF.L vs. WRB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kingfisher plc and W. R. Berkley Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KGF.L vs. WRB - Profitability Comparison
KGF.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingfisher plc reported a gross profit of 2.36B and revenue of 6.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.
WRB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported a gross profit of 765.46M and revenue of 3.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.6%.
KGF.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingfisher plc reported an operating income of 225.00M and revenue of 6.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
WRB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported an operating income of 606.51M and revenue of 3.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.
KGF.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingfisher plc reported a net income of 8.00M and revenue of 6.13B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
WRB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported a net income of 449.51M and revenue of 3.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KGF.L and WRB have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for KGF.L and WRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer