KGF.L vs. TSLA
KGF.L (Kingfisher plc) and TSLA (Tesla, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — KGF.L in Home Improvement Retail, TSLA in Auto Manufacturers. Over the past 10 years, KGF.L returned 1.34%/yr vs 40.17%/yr for TSLA. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KGF.L vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
KGF.L is traded in GBp, while TSLA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TSLA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with KGF.L having a -6.44% return and TSLA slightly lower at -6.58%. Over the past 10 years, KGF.L has underperformed TSLA with an annualized return of 1.34%, while TSLA has yielded a comparatively higher 40.17% annualized return.
KGF.L
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- -6.44%
- 6M
- -6.23%
- 1Y
- 6.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.72%
- 5Y*
- 0.79%
- 10Y*
- 1.34%
TSLA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- YTD
- -6.58%
- 6M
- -8.64%
- 1Y
- 48.66%
- 3Y*
- 20.51%
- 5Y*
- 17.20%
- 10Y*
- 40.17%
KGF.L vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGF.L Kingfisher plc | -6.44% | 31.00% | 6.88% | 8.82% | -26.52% | 29.62% | 24.61% | 10.17% | -36.11% | -0.45% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | -12.18% | 3.43% | 65.36% | 91.64% | -60.87% | 51.17% | 718.66% | 20.92% | 13.23% | 33.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGF.L and TSLA is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2010 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
KGF.L:
£4.84B
TSLA:
$1.38T
KGF.L:
£0.25
TSLA:
$1.10
KGF.L:
11.56
TSLA:
356.15
KGF.L:
0.19
TSLA:
14.10
KGF.L:
0.79
TSLA:
16.45
KGF.L:
£25.73B
TSLA:
$97.88B
KGF.L:
£9.69B
TSLA:
$18.66B
KGF.L:
£2.07B
TSLA:
$10.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGF.L vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank
KGF.L
TSLA
KGF.L vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingfisher plc (KGF.L) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KGF.L | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.20 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 1.64 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.57 | 3.78 | -3.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KGF.L | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 1.14 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.30 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | 0.69 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.75 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
KGF.L vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGF.L drawdown since its inception was -65.46%, smaller than the maximum TSLA drawdown of -70.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGF.L and TSLA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGF.L | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.46% | -70.26% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.23% | -29.83% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.39% | -54.95% | +24.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.48% | -70.26% | +27.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.36% | -70.26% | +6.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.04% | -17.39% | -3.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.62% | -21.70% | +1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.46% | 12.90% | -1.44% |
Volatility
KGF.L vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kingfisher plc (KGF.L) is 8.27%, while Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that KGF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGF.L | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.27% | 11.75% | -3.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.42% | 26.17% | -5.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.35% | 45.47% | -16.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.27% | 57.57% | -27.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.79% | 58.53% | -26.74% |
Dividends
KGF.L vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison
KGF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, while TSLA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGF.L Kingfisher plc | 4.36% | 3.97% | 4.99% | 5.10% | 5.25% | 3.56% | 0.00% | 4.99% | 5.21% | 3.10% | 2.90% | 3.04% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
KGF.L vs. TSLA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kingfisher plc and Tesla, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KGF.L vs. TSLA - Profitability Comparison
KGF.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingfisher plc reported a gross profit of 2.36B and revenue of 6.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.
TSLA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.72B and revenue of 22.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.
KGF.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingfisher plc reported an operating income of 225.00M and revenue of 6.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
TSLA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported an operating income of 941.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
KGF.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingfisher plc reported a net income of 8.00M and revenue of 6.13B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
TSLA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a net income of 491.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KGF.L and TSLA have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for KGF.L and TSLA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer