PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KGC vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KGC vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGC achieves a -18.39% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 29.29% return. Over the past 10 years, KGC has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 16.73%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.47% annualized return.


KGC

1D
-3.13%
1M
-18.11%
6M
-30.89%
YTD
-18.39%
1Y
48.12%
3Y*
67.31%
5Y*
32.25%
10Y*
16.73%

XLE

1D
0.92%
1M
3.74%
6M
21.42%
YTD
29.29%
1Y
36.53%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
22.95%
10Y*
9.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KGC vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
-18.39%206.11%55.63%51.83%-27.59%-19.00%56.04%46.30%-25.00%38.91%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
29.29%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between KGC and XLE is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.22

The correlation between KGC and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KGC vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KGC
KGC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
KGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
KGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KGC vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KGCXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.29

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

2.45

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.95

6.58

-3.63

KGC vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KGC Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGC and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KGC vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGC drawdown since its inception was -96.00%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGC and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KGCXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.00%

-71.26%

-24.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.64%

-14.98%

-24.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.64%

-20.14%

-19.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.22%

-26.04%

-29.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.75%

-66.81%

-0.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.64%

-8.20%

-31.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.54%

-17.95%

-39.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.38%

5.57%

+10.81%

Volatility

KGC vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) has a higher volatility of 13.06% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 6.10%. This indicates that KGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KGCXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.06%

6.10%

+6.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.55%

16.65%

+24.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.29%

20.96%

+31.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.37%

25.87%

+18.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.96%

29.58%

+17.38%

Dividends

KGC vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than XLE's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.63%0.44%1.29%1.98%2.93%2.69%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.66%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


KGC and XLE have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KGC has higher volatility (13.06%) compared to XLE (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGC dropped -96.00% vs XLE's -71.26%.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KGC and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer