KGC vs. SMH
KGC (Kinross Gold Corporation) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, KGC returned 18.81%/yr vs 37.49%/yr for SMH. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KGC vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGC achieves a -8.92% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.15% return. Over the past 10 years, KGC has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 18.81%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.
KGC
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -18.08%
- YTD
- -8.92%
- 6M
- -8.14%
- 1Y
- 65.63%
- 3Y*
- 76.13%
- 5Y*
- 29.09%
- 10Y*
- 18.81%
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 136.32%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
KGC vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | -8.92% | 206.11% | 55.63% | 51.83% | -27.59% | -19.00% | 56.04% | 46.30% | -25.00% | 38.91% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGC and SMH is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000 | 0.12 |
The correlation between KGC and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGC vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
KGC
SMH
KGC vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KGC | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.60 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 9.18 | -7.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.20 | 33.74 | -28.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KGC vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGC drawdown since its inception was -96.00%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGC and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGC | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.00% | -84.96% | -11.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.69% | -14.93% | -22.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.69% | -35.74% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.29% | -45.30% | -13.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.75% | -45.30% | -22.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.63% | -2.81% | -29.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.60% | -41.04% | -16.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.66% | 4.06% | +8.60% |
Volatility
KGC vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) has a higher volatility of 18.21% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 16.25%. This indicates that KGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGC | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.21% | 16.25% | +1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.59% | 27.73% | +12.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.35% | 33.20% | +18.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.22% | 35.47% | +8.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.01% | 32.82% | +14.19% |
Dividends
KGC vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.57% | 0.44% | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KGC and SMH have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KGC has higher volatility (18.21%) compared to SMH (16.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGC dropped -96.00% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KGC and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer