PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KGC vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KGC vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGC achieves a -8.92% return, which is significantly lower than GDX's -6.69% return. Over the past 10 years, KGC has outperformed GDX with an annualized return of 18.81%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.29% annualized return.


KGC

1D
2.90%
1M
-18.08%
YTD
-8.92%
6M
-8.14%
1Y
65.63%
3Y*
76.13%
5Y*
29.09%
10Y*
18.81%

GDX

1D
2.97%
1M
-16.83%
YTD
-6.69%
6M
-5.89%
1Y
50.59%
3Y*
38.96%
5Y*
17.51%
10Y*
13.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KGC vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
-8.92%206.11%55.63%51.83%-27.59%-19.00%56.04%46.30%-25.00%38.91%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-6.69%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-8.77%11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between KGC and GDX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2006

0.87

The correlation between KGC and GDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KGC vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KGC
KGC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
KGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
KGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KGC vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KGCGDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.21

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

1.40

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

3.87

+1.33

KGC vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KGC Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGC and GDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KGC vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGC drawdown since its inception was -96.00%, which is greater than GDX's maximum drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGC and GDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KGCGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.00%

-80.34%

-15.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.69%

-36.28%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.69%

-36.28%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.29%

-46.51%

-12.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.75%

-49.79%

-17.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.63%

-30.91%

-1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.60%

-40.41%

-17.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.66%

13.11%

-0.45%

Volatility

KGC vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) has a higher volatility of 18.21% compared to VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) at 17.20%. This indicates that KGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KGCGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.21%

17.20%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.59%

39.15%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.35%

46.89%

+4.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.22%

36.74%

+7.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.01%

37.34%

+9.67%

Dividends

KGC vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than GDX's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.79%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.57%0.44%1.29%1.98%2.93%2.69%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, KGC and GDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

KGC has higher volatility (18.21%) compared to GDX (17.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGC dropped -96.00% vs GDX's -80.34%.

KGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KGC and GDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer