PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KGC vs. CRDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KGC vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KGC achieves a -17.75% return, which is significantly lower than CRDO's 43.85% return.


KGC

1D
-2.20%
1M
-1.58%
6M
-26.61%
YTD
-17.75%
1Y
45.18%
3Y*
71.30%
5Y*
30.97%
10Y*
16.68%
ALL TIME*
4.99%

CRDO

1D
2.94%
1M
-20.11%
6M
65.22%
YTD
43.85%
1Y
85.56%
3Y*
130.87%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
87.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.17B$1.40B$1.87B
$162.18M$178.21M$212.46M

KGC vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
-17.75%206.11%55.63%51.83%-22.95%
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
43.85%114.09%245.20%46.28%10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between KGC and CRDO is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KGC:

$27.58B

CRDO:

$38.60B

EPS

KGC:

$2.61

CRDO:

$2.50

PE Ratio

KGC:

8.84

CRDO:

82.94

PEG Ratio

KGC:

0.12

CRDO:

0.07

PS Ratio

KGC:

3.32

CRDO:

29.34

PB Ratio

KGC:

2.86

CRDO:

19.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

KGC:

$8.39B

CRDO:

$1.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KGC:

$4.50B

CRDO:

$908.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

KGC:

$5.58B

CRDO:

$463.79M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KGC vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KGC
KGC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
KGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
KGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDO
CRDO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KGC vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KGCCRDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.20

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

1.61

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.49

3.65

-1.16

KGC vs. CRDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KGC Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the CRDO Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KGC and CRDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KGC vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KGC drawdown since its inception was -96.00%, which is greater than CRDO's maximum drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGC and CRDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KGCCRDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.00%

-62.04%

-33.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.66%

-53.59%

+12.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.66%

-61.05%

+20.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.16%

-31.58%

-7.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.51%

-19.39%

-38.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.22%

23.55%

-5.33%

Volatility

KGC vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) is 12.31%, while Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a volatility of 29.83%. This indicates that KGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KGCCRDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.31%

29.83%

-17.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.64%

73.09%

-32.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.21%

92.00%

-39.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.41%

82.43%

-38.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.87%

82.43%

-35.56%

Dividends

KGC vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison

KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while CRDO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.63%0.44%1.29%1.98%2.93%2.69%0.82%

Financials

KGC vs. CRDO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

KGC vs. CRDO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kinross Gold Corporation and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

KGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.21B and revenue of 2.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.

CRDO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

KGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.14B and revenue of 2.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.5%.

CRDO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.

KGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 822.76M and revenue of 2.18B, resulting in a net margin of 37.7%.

CRDO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KGC and CRDO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRDO has higher volatility (29.83%) compared to KGC (12.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGC dropped -96.00% vs CRDO's -62.04%.

CRDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KGC and CRDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer