KGC vs. CIFR
KGC (Kinross Gold Corporation) and CIFR (Cipher Digital Inc.) are both stocks. KGC operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while CIFR operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 3 years, KGC returned 71.30%/yr vs 84.92%/yr for CIFR. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KGC vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KGC achieves a -17.75% return, which is significantly lower than CIFR's 51.22% return.
KGC
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- 6M
- -26.61%
- YTD
- -17.75%
- 1Y
- 45.18%
- 3Y*
- 71.30%
- 5Y*
- 30.97%
- 10Y*
- 16.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.99%
CIFR
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- 6M
- 39.85%
- YTD
- 51.22%
- 1Y
- 308.79%
- 3Y*
- 84.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $699.13M | $580.45M | $601.55M | |
| $162.18M | $178.21M | $212.46M |
KGC vs. CIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | -17.75% | 206.11% | 55.63% | 51.83% | -27.59% | -3.49% |
CIFR Cipher Digital Inc. | 51.22% | 218.10% | 12.35% | 637.50% | -87.90% | -54.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between KGC and CIFR is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021 | 0.18 |
The correlation between KGC and CIFR shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KGC:
$27.58B
CIFR:
$9.13B
KGC:
$2.61
CIFR:
-$2.32
KGC:
3.32
CIFR:
49.45
KGC:
2.86
CIFR:
12.66
KGC:
$8.39B
CIFR:
$174.98M
KGC:
$4.50B
CIFR:
-$172.84M
KGC:
$5.58B
CIFR:
-$169.22M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KGC vs. CIFR — Risk / Return Rank
KGC
CIFR
KGC vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) and Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KGC | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.35 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 6.06 | -4.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.49 | 11.90 | -9.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KGC vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KGC drawdown since its inception was -96.00%, roughly equal to the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KGC and CIFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KGC | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.00% | -97.16% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.66% | -51.38% | +10.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.66% | -71.74% | +31.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.16% | -23.51% | -15.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.51% | -65.01% | +7.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.22% | 26.14% | -7.92% |
Volatility
KGC vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) is 12.31%, while Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) has a volatility of 46.50%. This indicates that KGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KGC | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.31% | 46.50% | -34.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.64% | 79.79% | -39.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.21% | 115.46% | -63.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.41% | 122.42% | -78.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.87% | 122.42% | -75.55% |
Dividends
KGC vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison
KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while CIFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIFR Cipher Digital Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.63% | 0.44% | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 0.82% |
Financials
KGC vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinross Gold Corporation and Cipher Digital Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
KGC and CIFR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIFR has higher volatility (46.50%) compared to KGC (12.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KGC dropped -96.00% vs CIFR's -97.16%.
CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KGC and CIFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer