KFRC vs. AES

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KFRC (Kforce Inc.) and AES (The AES Corporation) are both stocks. KFRC operates in Staffing & Employment Services (Industrials), while AES operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, KFRC returned 11.79%/yr vs 6.68%/yr for AES. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KFRC vs. AES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kforce Inc. (KFRC) and The AES Corporation (AES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KFRC achieves a 52.32% return, which is significantly higher than AES's 5.07% return. Over the past 10 years, KFRC has outperformed AES with an annualized return of 11.79%, while AES has yielded a comparatively lower 6.68% annualized return.

KFRC

• 1D: -3.11%
• 1M: 7.63%
• YTD: 52.32%
• 6M: 58.65%
• 1Y: 18.12%
• 3Y*: -5.02%
• 5Y*: -3.22%
• 10Y*: 11.79%

AES

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 3.01%
• YTD: 5.07%
• 6M: 9.90%
• 1Y: 50.59%
• 3Y*: -5.64%
• 5Y*: -6.44%
• 10Y*: 6.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KFRC vs. AES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KFRC Kforce Inc.	52.32%	-43.07%	-14.03%	26.14%	-25.69%	81.56%	8.49%	31.03%	24.68%	11.85%
AES The AES Corporation	5.07%	18.26%	-30.40%	-30.88%	21.69%	5.94%	22.16%	42.14%	39.02%	-2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between KFRC and AES is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 1995	0.22

The correlation between KFRC and AES shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS KFRC : $1.95 AES : $1.97
PE Ratio KFRC : 23.76 AES : 7.48
PS Ratio KFRC : 0.62 AES : 0.63
Total Revenue (TTM) KFRC : $1.33B AES : $12.49B
Gross Profit (TTM) KFRC : $361.86M AES : $1.77B
EBITDA (TTM) KFRC : $53.65M AES : $2.73B

Return for Risk

KFRC vs. AES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KFRC

KFRC Risk / Return Rank: 52
KFRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
KFRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
KFRC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
KFRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
KFRC Martin Ratio Rank: 47

AES

AES Risk / Return Rank: 77
AES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
AES Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
AES Omega Ratio Rank: 81
AES Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
AES Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KFRC vs. AES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kforce Inc. (KFRC) and The AES Corporation (AES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KFRC	AES	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.27	1.18	-0.92
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	1.90	-0.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.33	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.39	2.68	-2.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.61	5.12	-4.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KFRC vs. AES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KFRC Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the AES Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KFRC and AES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KFRC	AES	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27	1.18	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	-0.17	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	0.19	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.13	+0.04

Drawdowns

KFRC vs. AES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KFRC drawdown since its inception was -94.60%, roughly equal to the maximum AES drawdown of -98.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KFRC and AES.

Drawdown Indicators

	KFRC	AES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.60%	-98.65%	+4.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.03%	-18.98%	-28.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-64.72%	-53.33%	-11.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.41%	-63.43%	-2.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.41%	-63.43%	-2.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.68%	-62.00%	+27.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.73%	-57.02%	+14.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.77%	9.91%	+19.86%

Volatility

KFRC vs. AES - Volatility Comparison

Kforce Inc. (KFRC) has a higher volatility of 12.00% compared to The AES Corporation (AES) at 1.51%. This indicates that KFRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KFRC	AES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.00%	1.51%	+10.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.26%	25.70%	+21.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.12%	42.94%	+25.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.55%	37.83%	+3.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.60%	36.06%	+3.54%

Dividends

KFRC vs. AES - Dividend Comparison

KFRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than AES's 4.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AES The AES Corporation	4.78%	4.91%	5.36%	3.45%	2.20%	2.48%	2.44%	2.74%	3.60%	4.43%	3.79%	4.18%
KFRC Kforce Inc.	3.38%	5.05%	2.68%	2.13%	2.19%	1.30%	1.90%	1.81%	1.94%	1.90%	2.08%	1.78%

Financials

KFRC vs. AES - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kforce Inc. and The AES Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KFRC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kforce Inc. reported a gross profit of 90.07M and revenue of 330.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.

AES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The AES Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

KFRC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kforce Inc. reported an operating income of 12.01M and revenue of 330.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

AES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The AES Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

KFRC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kforce Inc. reported a net income of 7.93M and revenue of 330.36M, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.

AES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The AES Corporation reported a net income of 201.00M and revenue of 3.18B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KFRC and AES in my portfolio?

KFRC and AES have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KFRC or AES?

KFRC has higher volatility (12.00%) compared to AES (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KFRC dropped -94.60% vs AES's -98.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.