KEN vs. RDVI
KEN (Kenon Holdings Ltd.) is a stock, while RDVI (FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF) is Derivative Income fund tracking the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the past 3 years, KEN returned 56.23%/yr vs 20.36%/yr for RDVI. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KEN vs. RDVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEN achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly lower than RDVI's 13.85% return.
KEN
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -22.31%
- YTD
- 5.02%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 76.84%
- 3Y*
- 56.23%
- 5Y*
- 29.63%
- 10Y*
- 39.53%
RDVI
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 5.10%
- YTD
- 13.85%
- 6M
- 12.01%
- 1Y
- 27.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KEN vs. RDVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 5.02% | 126.18% | 62.44% | -19.16% | -9.64% |
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 13.85% | 17.93% | 14.56% | 18.63% | 8.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEN and RDVI is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2022 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEN vs. RDVI — Risk / Return Rank
KEN
RDVI
KEN vs. RDVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KEN | RDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 3.30 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.28 | 13.91 | -4.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KEN vs. RDVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEN drawdown since its inception was -69.20%, which is greater than RDVI's maximum drawdown of -18.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEN and RDVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEN | RDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.20% | -18.35% | -50.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.69% | -8.48% | -22.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.27% | -18.35% | -13.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.29% | -0.86% | -29.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.20% | -3.13% | -20.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.31% | 2.01% | +6.30% |
Volatility
KEN vs. RDVI - Volatility Comparison
Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) has a higher volatility of 15.37% compared to FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) at 4.91%. This indicates that KEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEN | RDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.37% | 4.91% | +10.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.48% | 11.11% | +20.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.96% | 13.79% | +26.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.96% | 16.95% | +23.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.88% | 16.95% | +24.93% |
Dividends
KEN vs. RDVI - Dividend Comparison
KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, less than RDVI's 7.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 5.78% | 7.24% | 11.18% | 11.46% | 25.00% | 7.35% | 7.41% | 5.75% | 96.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 45.52% |
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 7.63% | 8.10% | 8.62% | 8.45% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KEN and RDVI have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEN has higher volatility (15.37%) compared to RDVI (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEN dropped -69.20% vs RDVI's -18.35%.
RDVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KEN and RDVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer