KEN vs. GGLL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

KEN (Kenon Holdings Ltd.) is a stock, while GGLL (Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Alphabet Inc. Class A (200%). Over the past 3 years, KEN returned 64.62%/yr vs 68.87%/yr for GGLL. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KEN vs. GGLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEN achieves a 25.41% return, which is significantly lower than GGLL's 30.87% return.

KEN

• 1D: -2.30%
• 1M: -16.76%
• YTD: 25.41%
• 6M: 36.06%
• 1Y: 125.86%
• 3Y*: 64.62%
• 5Y*: 34.95%
• 10Y*: 42.65%

GGLL

• 1D: 7.06%
• 1M: -9.57%
• YTD: 30.87%
• 6M: 25.77%
• 1Y: 311.83%
• 3Y*: 68.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEN vs. GGLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd.	25.41%	126.18%	62.44%	-19.16%	-5.31%
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares	30.87%	123.07%	48.88%	81.20%	-30.35%

Correlation

The correlation between KEN and GGLL is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022	0.25

Return for Risk

KEN vs. GGLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEN

KEN Risk / Return Rank: 94
KEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
KEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
KEN Omega Ratio Rank: 92
KEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
KEN Martin Ratio Rank: 96

GGLL

GGLL Risk / Return Rank: 95
GGLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
GGLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
GGLL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
GGLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GGLL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEN vs. GGLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KEN	GGLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.28	5.36	-2.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	5.11	-1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.61	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.55	8.18	-0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.03	28.11	-6.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KEN vs. GGLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEN Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is lower than the GGLL Sharpe Ratio of 5.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEN and GGLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KEN	GGLL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.28	5.36	-2.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	1.03	-0.27

Drawdowns

KEN vs. GGLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEN drawdown since its inception was -69.20%, which is greater than GGLL's maximum drawdown of -52.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEN and GGLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	KEN	GGLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.20%	-52.81%	-16.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.76%	-38.39%	+21.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.27%	-52.81%	+20.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.76%	-15.44%	-1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.19%	-15.17%	-8.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.74%	11.15%	-5.41%

Volatility

KEN vs. GGLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) is 14.76%, while Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) has a volatility of 17.94%. This indicates that KEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KEN	GGLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.76%	17.94%	-3.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.43%	41.25%	-11.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.62%	58.62%	-20.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.69%	56.11%	-16.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.86%	56.11%	-14.25%

Dividends

KEN vs. GGLL - Dividend Comparison

KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than GGLL's 3.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares	3.49%	4.16%	3.29%	2.05%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd.	4.84%	7.24%	11.18%	11.46%	25.00%	7.35%	7.41%	5.75%	96.34%	0.00%	0.00%	45.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KEN and GGLL in my portfolio?

KEN and GGLL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KEN or GGLL?

GGLL has higher volatility (17.94%) compared to KEN (14.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEN dropped -69.20% vs GGLL's -52.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.36 vs 3.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.