KEMX vs. PATN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) and PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KEMX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while PATN is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KEMX returned 56.00% vs 53.28% for PATN. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. KEMX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PATN.

Performance

KEMX vs. PATN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with KEMX having a 30.22% return and PATN slightly lower at 28.74%.

KEMX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -4.08%
• 6M: 16.35%
• YTD: 30.22%
• 1Y: 56.00%
• 3Y*: 25.12%
• 5Y*: 12.08%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.50%

PATN

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -3.34%
• 6M: 17.25%
• YTD: 28.74%
• 1Y: 53.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 35.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	$527.87K	$528.96K	$586.53K
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	$6.30M	$4.83M	$3.83M

KEMX vs. PATN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	30.22%	38.28%	-7.15%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	28.74%	40.01%	-1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between KEMX and PATN is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024	0.86

The correlation between KEMX and PATN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

KEMX vs. PATN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KEMX	PATN
Technology	46.4%	43.9%
Financial Services	20.3%	0.7%
Industrials	7.5%	17.5%
Basic Materials	7.3%	3.2%
Consumer Cyclical	4.9%	10.5%
Energy	3.6%	0.9%
Communication Services	3.0%	7.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	6.2%
Utilities	1.6%	-
Healthcare	1.5%	9.5%
Real Estate	1.1%	-

Return for Risk

KEMX vs. PATN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KEMX

KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 83
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

PATN

PATN Risk / Return Rank: 83
PATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
PATN Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
PATN Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KEMX vs. PATN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KEMX	PATN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	2.11	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	2.71	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.38	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.49	3.72	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.97	11.66	-0.69

KEMX vs. PATN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the PATN Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEMX and PATN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KEMX vs. PATN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEMX drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, which is greater than PATN's maximum drawdown of -16.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMX and PATN.

Drawdown Indicators

	KEMX	PATN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.80%	-16.77%	-22.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.11%	-14.40%	-1.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.37%	-9.34%	-2.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.82%	-3.44%	-5.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.12%	4.58%	+0.54%

Volatility

KEMX vs. PATN - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.60% compared to Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) at 8.80%. This indicates that KEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PATN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KEMX	PATN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.60%	8.80%	+0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.90%	22.85%	+2.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.99%	25.38%	+1.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.41%	22.70%	-3.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.51%	22.70%	-1.19%

KEMX vs. PATN - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PATN's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

KEMX vs. PATN - Dividend Comparison

KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than PATN's 1.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	2.52%	3.28%	3.39%	2.00%	4.10%	4.79%	1.69%	2.77%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	1.69%	2.25%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KEMX and PATN in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, KEMX and PATN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, KEMX or PATN?

KEMX has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to PATN (8.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMX dropped -38.80% vs PATN's -16.77%.

Which ETF is better, KEMX or PATN?

On 1-year performance, KEMX leads with 56.00% vs 53.28% for PATN. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PATN has been the lower-risk option at 8.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KEMX or PATN?

Over the 1-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 56.00% return vs 53.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KEMX or PATN?

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PATN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KEMX or PATN?

KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 1.69% for PATN.

What is the main difference between KEMX and PATN?

KEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PATN is Foreign Large Cap Equities. KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while PATN tracks Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for KEMX and 0.65% for PATN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.