KEMX vs. PATN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) and PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - KEMX tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index while PATN tracks the Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KEMX returned 71.39% vs 65.39% for PATN. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KEMX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PATN.

Performance

KEMX vs. PATN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEMX achieves a 38.57% return, which is significantly higher than PATN's 34.64% return.

KEMX

• 1D: -5.69%
• 1M: 5.55%
• YTD: 38.57%
• 6M: 40.16%
• 1Y: 71.39%
• 3Y*: 28.36%
• 5Y*: 13.33%
• 10Y*: —

PATN

• 1D: -5.19%
• 1M: 4.01%
• YTD: 34.64%
• 6M: 35.70%
• 1Y: 65.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEMX vs. PATN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	38.57%	38.28%	-7.15%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	34.64%	40.01%	-1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between KEMX and PATN is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2024	0.85

The correlation between KEMX and PATN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

KEMX vs. PATN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KEMX	PATN
Technology	46.8%	52.5%
Financial Services	18.7%	0.5%
Industrials	7.6%	14.8%
Basic Materials	7.6%	2.4%
Consumer Cyclical	5.5%	7.0%
Energy	4.0%	2.1%
Communication Services	2.9%	6.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	5.2%
Utilities	1.7%	-
Healthcare	1.5%	9.4%
Real Estate	1.0%	-

Return for Risk

KEMX vs. PATN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMX

KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 87
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

PATN

PATN Risk / Return Rank: 87
PATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
PATN Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PATN Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEMX vs. PATN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KEMX	PATN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	2.75	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	3.37	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.49	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.67	4.56	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.76	17.76	0.00

KEMX vs. PATN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the PATN Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEMX and PATN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KEMX vs. PATN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEMX drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, which is greater than PATN's maximum drawdown of -16.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMX and PATN.

Drawdown Indicators

	KEMX	PATN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.80%	-16.77%	-22.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.36%	-14.40%	-0.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.69%	-5.19%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.82%	-3.17%	-5.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.03%	3.69%	+0.34%

Volatility

KEMX vs. PATN - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) have volatilities of 13.52% and 12.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KEMX	PATN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.52%	12.88%	+0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.20%	21.37%	+1.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.26%	23.92%	+1.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.96%	22.26%	-3.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.33%	22.26%	-0.93%

KEMX vs. PATN - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PATN's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

KEMX vs. PATN - Dividend Comparison

KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than PATN's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	2.37%	3.28%	3.39%	2.00%	4.10%	4.79%	1.69%	2.77%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	1.61%	2.25%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KEMX and PATN in my portfolio?

KEMX and PATN have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KEMX or PATN?

KEMX has higher volatility (13.52%) compared to PATN (12.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMX dropped -38.80% vs PATN's -16.77%.

Which ETF is better, KEMX or PATN?

On 1-year performance, KEMX leads with 71.39% vs 65.39% for PATN. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PATN has been the lower-risk option at 12.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KEMX or PATN?

Over the 1-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 71.39% return vs 65.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KEMX or PATN?

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PATN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KEMX or PATN?

KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.61% for PATN.

What is the main difference between KEMX and PATN?

KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while PATN tracks Nasdaq International Patent Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for KEMX and 0.65% for PATN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.