KEMQ vs. VEXC
KEMQ (KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF) and VEXC (Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - KEMQ tracks the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index while VEXC tracks the FTSE Emerging ex China Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KEMQ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VEXC.
Performance
KEMQ vs. VEXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEMQ achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly lower than VEXC's 20.21% return.
KEMQ
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- 1Y
- 36.95%
- 3Y*
- 24.42%
- 5Y*
- -2.87%
- 10Y*
- —
VEXC
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 20.21%
- 6M
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KEMQ vs. VEXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | 6.99% | -4.16% |
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 20.21% | 4.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEMQ and VEXC is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEMQ vs. VEXC — Risk / Return Rank
KEMQ
VEXC
KEMQ vs. VEXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KEMQ | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KEMQ | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 2.21 | -2.15 |
Drawdowns
KEMQ vs. VEXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEMQ drawdown since its inception was -70.72%, which is greater than VEXC's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMQ and VEXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEMQ | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.72% | -12.42% | -58.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.14% | -1.20% | -26.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.69% | -2.23% | -33.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.20% | — | — |
Volatility
KEMQ vs. VEXC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEMQ | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.14% | 18.89% | +7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.88% | 18.89% | +12.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 18.89% | +10.69% |
KEMQ vs. VEXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
KEMQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VEXC's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
KEMQ vs. VEXC - Dividend Comparison
KEMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than VEXC's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | 4.92% | 5.27% | 0.73% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 2.28% | 1.76% |
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 0.74% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KEMQ and VEXC have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEXC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEXC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KEMQ.
KEMQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 0.74% for VEXC.
KEMQ tracks Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index, while VEXC tracks FTSE Emerging ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for KEMQ and 0.07% for VEXC.
Find the right allocation for KEMQ and VEXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer