KEMQ vs. REMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KEMQ (KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF) and REMX (VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KEMQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index, while REMX is a Materials fund tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KEMQ returned -2.87%/yr vs 4.50%/yr for REMX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KEMQ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.

Performance

KEMQ vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEMQ achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 33.01% return.

KEMQ

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: 7.12%
• YTD: 6.99%
• 6M: 8.35%
• 1Y: 36.95%
• 3Y*: 24.42%
• 5Y*: -2.87%
• 10Y*: —

REMX

• 1D: -3.78%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: 33.01%
• 6M: 37.14%
• 1Y: 172.35%
• 3Y*: 6.84%
• 5Y*: 4.50%
• 10Y*: 10.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEMQ vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF	6.99%	56.28%	13.81%	0.77%	-38.09%	-27.31%	39.26%	28.26%	-25.52%	1.88%
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF	33.01%	92.95%	-35.02%	-19.18%	-31.13%	79.81%	64.82%	0.74%	-49.63%	15.81%

Correlation

The correlation between KEMQ and REMX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2017	0.57

The correlation between KEMQ and REMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KEMQ vs. REMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KEMQ	REMX
Technology	45.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	33.0%	-
Communication Services	15.5%	-
Healthcare	3.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	100.0%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KEMQ vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMQ

KEMQ Risk / Return Rank: 36
KEMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
KEMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
KEMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 38
KEMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
KEMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 31

REMX

REMX Risk / Return Rank: 87
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEMQ vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KEMQ	REMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	3.61	-2.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	3.66	-1.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.46	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	7.43	-5.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.52	21.32	-16.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KEMQ vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEMQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEMQ and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KEMQ	REMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42	3.61	-2.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09	0.11	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	-0.08	+0.14

Drawdowns

KEMQ vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEMQ drawdown since its inception was -70.72%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMQ and REMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	KEMQ	REMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.72%	-90.20%	+19.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.94%	-23.35%	+1.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.94%	-62.11%	+40.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.02%	-73.34%	+7.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-73.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.14%	-54.98%	+26.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.69%	-66.87%	+31.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.20%	8.12%	+0.08%

Volatility

KEMQ vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) is 10.09%, while VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 13.02%. This indicates that KEMQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KEMQ	REMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.09%	13.02%	-2.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.87%	34.77%	-13.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.14%	48.11%	-21.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.88%	40.24%	-8.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.58%	36.94%	-7.36%

KEMQ vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEMQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

KEMQ vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

KEMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than REMX's 1.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF	4.92%	5.27%	0.73%	0.29%	0.00%	0.28%	2.28%	1.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF	1.32%	1.76%	2.56%	0.00%	1.56%	5.25%	0.81%	1.64%	12.43%	2.89%	2.23%	4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KEMQ and REMX in my portfolio?

KEMQ and REMX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KEMQ or REMX?

REMX has higher volatility (13.02%) compared to KEMQ (10.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMQ dropped -70.72% vs REMX's -90.20%.

Which ETF is better, KEMQ or REMX?

On 5-year performance, REMX leads with 4.50% vs -2.87% for KEMQ. On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, KEMQ has been the lower-risk option at 10.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KEMQ or REMX?

Over the 5-year period, REMX has performed better with a 4.50% return vs -2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KEMQ or REMX?

REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KEMQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KEMQ or REMX?

KEMQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 1.32% for REMX.

What is the main difference between KEMQ and REMX?

KEMQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while REMX is Materials. KEMQ tracks Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index, while REMX tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for KEMQ and 0.59% for REMX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.