PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KCOP vs. XRMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KCOP vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


KCOP

1D
-3.46%
1M
14.96%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XRMI

1D
-0.20%
1M
1.38%
YTD
1.75%
6M
2.96%
1Y
9.48%
3Y*
6.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KCOP vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KCOP and XRMI is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2026

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KCOP vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCOP

XRMI
XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCOP vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KCOP vs. XRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KCOPXRMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.37

+0.03

Drawdowns

KCOP vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCOP drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCOP and XRMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KCOPXRMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.55%

-15.31%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.46%

-0.20%

-3.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.60%

-5.94%

-2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

Volatility

KCOP vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KCOPXRMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.13%

5.39%

+36.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.13%

6.91%

+35.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.13%

6.91%

+35.22%

KCOP vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

KCOP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

KCOP vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

KCOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than XRMI's 12.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
KCOP
Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF
3.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.62%12.35%11.86%12.62%12.84%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


KCOP and XRMI have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KCOP.

XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.62%, compared with 3.54% for KCOP.

They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KCOP and 0.60% for XRMI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KCOP and XRMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer