KCOP vs. XRMI
KCOP (Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF) and XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. KCOP is actively managed, while XRMI is passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KCOP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XRMI.
Performance
KCOP vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KCOP
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- 14.96%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRMI
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 9.48%
- 3Y*
- 6.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KCOP vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 4.75% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCOP and XRMI is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCOP vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank
KCOP
XRMI
KCOP vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KCOP | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.37 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
KCOP vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCOP drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCOP and XRMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCOP | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.55% | -15.31% | -6.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -0.20% | -3.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.60% | -5.94% | -2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.23% | — |
Volatility
KCOP vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCOP | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.13% | 5.39% | +36.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.13% | 6.91% | +35.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.13% | 6.91% | +35.22% |
KCOP vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCOP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCOP vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison
KCOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than XRMI's 12.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 3.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.62% | 12.35% | 11.86% | 12.62% | 12.84% | 2.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCOP and XRMI have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KCOP.
XRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.62%, compared with 3.54% for KCOP.
They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KCOP and 0.60% for XRMI.
Find the right allocation for KCOP and XRMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer