KCOP vs. ICOP
KCOP (Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF) and ICOP (iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF) are both Copper funds. KCOP is actively managed, while ICOP is passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. KCOP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for ICOP.
Performance
KCOP vs. ICOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KCOP
- 1D
- -5.58%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICOP
- 1D
- -5.31%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 13.96%
- 6M
- 12.44%
- 1Y
- 82.41%
- 3Y*
- 30.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KCOP vs. ICOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | -4.46% |
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF | -4.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCOP and ICOP is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2026 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCOP vs. ICOP — Risk / Return Rank
KCOP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ICOP
KCOP vs. ICOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP) and iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KCOP | ICOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KCOP vs. ICOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCOP drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, smaller than the maximum ICOP drawdown of -38.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCOP and ICOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCOP | ICOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.55% | -38.67% | +17.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.61% | -13.41% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -11.61% | +3.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.41% | — |
Volatility
KCOP vs. ICOP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCOP | ICOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 35.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.23% | 39.67% | +4.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.23% | 34.44% | +9.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.23% | 34.44% | +9.79% |
KCOP vs. ICOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCOP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ICOP's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCOP vs. ICOP - Dividend Comparison
KCOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, more than ICOP's 1.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF | 1.78% | 2.08% | 1.87% | 2.15% |
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 5.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, KCOP and ICOP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ICOP is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICOP is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KCOP.
KCOP has the higher dividend yield at 5.29%, compared with 1.78% for ICOP.
They also come from different issuers: Kurv and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KCOP and 0.47% for ICOP.
Find the right allocation for KCOP and ICOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer