PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KCE vs. GSIB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KCE vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KCE vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
KCE
SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF
-8.04%10.76%37.51%2.76%
GSIB
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
-1.46%61.67%32.86%2.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCE achieves a -8.04% return, which is significantly lower than GSIB's -1.46% return.


KCE

1D
-0.33%
1M
-5.99%
YTD
-8.04%
6M
-7.70%
1Y
9.74%
3Y*
20.41%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
15.83%

GSIB

1D
1.75%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
-1.46%
6M
10.28%
1Y
39.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KCE vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KCE and GSIB have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Return for Risk

KCE vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KCE
KCE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
KCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
KCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIB
GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KCE vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KCEGSIBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.38

1.93

-1.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.69

2.55

-1.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.36

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

2.70

-2.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.63

9.19

-7.56

KCE vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCE Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCE and GSIB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KCEGSIBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

1.93

-1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

2.20

-1.96

Correlation

The correlation between KCE and GSIB is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

KCE vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

KCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than GSIB's 1.93% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KCE
SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF
1.88%1.63%1.56%1.82%2.42%1.53%2.20%2.32%2.67%1.95%2.30%2.43%
GSIB
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
1.93%1.91%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

KCE vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCE drawdown since its inception was -74.00%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCE and GSIB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KCEGSIBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.00%

-17.71%

-56.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.44%

-14.59%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.62%

-8.30%

-6.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.94%

-2.07%

-20.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.56%

4.28%

+2.28%

Volatility

KCE vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) is 6.28%, while Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that KCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KCEGSIBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.28%

7.60%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.62%

13.15%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.68%

20.85%

+4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.95%

18.41%

+4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.21%

18.41%

+4.80%