KCE vs. GSIB

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

KCE (SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF) and GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. KCE is passively managed, while GSIB is actively managed. Over the past year, KCE returned 11.58% vs 49.59% for GSIB. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

KCE vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KCE achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly lower than GSIB's 23.08% return.

KCE

• 1D: 2.41%
• 1M: 6.88%
• 6M: 6.20%
• YTD: 10.39%
• 1Y: 11.58%
• 3Y*: 24.32%
• 5Y*: 13.62%
• 10Y*: 17.63%
• ALL TIME*: 7.76%

GSIB

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 6.91%
• 6M: 16.90%
• YTD: 23.08%
• 1Y: 49.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 45.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	$1.86M	$1.42M	$773.56K
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF	$2.49M	$2.29M	$2.43M

KCE vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF	10.39%	10.76%	37.51%	2.31%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	23.08%	61.67%	32.86%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between KCE and GSIB is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	0.66

The correlation between KCE and GSIB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

KCE vs. GSIB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KCE	GSIB
Financial Services	97.2%	99.6%
Technology	2.8%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KCE vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KCE

KCE Risk / Return Rank: 24
KCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
KCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
KCE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
KCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
KCE Martin Ratio Rank: 23

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 91
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 92
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KCE vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KCE	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	2.80	-2.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.90	3.86	-2.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.46	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	3.58	-2.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.70	12.59	-10.89

KCE vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KCE Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KCE and GSIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KCE vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KCE drawdown since its inception was -74.00%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCE and GSIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	KCE	GSIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.00%	-17.71%	-56.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.44%	-13.90%	-3.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.65%	-1.99%	-20.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.84%	3.95%	+2.89%

Volatility

KCE vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) at 5.73%. This indicates that KCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KCE	GSIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.71%	5.73%	+0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.07%	14.90%	+1.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.73%	17.83%	+2.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.16%	18.45%	+4.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.89%	18.45%	+4.44%

KCE vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KCE and GSIB have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

KCE vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

KCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than GSIB's 1.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.55%	1.91%	1.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF	1.63%	1.63%	1.56%	1.82%	2.42%	1.53%	2.20%	2.32%	2.67%	1.95%	2.30%	2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KCE and GSIB in my portfolio?

KCE and GSIB have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KCE or GSIB?

KCE has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to GSIB (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCE dropped -74.00% vs GSIB's -17.71%.

Which ETF is better, KCE or GSIB?

On 1-year performance, GSIB leads with 49.59% vs 11.58% for KCE. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, GSIB has been the lower-risk option at 5.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KCE or GSIB?

Over the 1-year period, GSIB has performed better with a 49.59% return vs 11.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KCE or GSIB?

KCE and GSIB have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KCE or GSIB?

KCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.55% for GSIB.

What is the main difference between KCE and GSIB?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Themes.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.