RNMBY vs. RR.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L).
Performance
RNMBY vs. RR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RNMBY vs. RR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR | -8.07% | 190.28% | 99.83% | 63.35% | 122.00% | -13.84% | -2.03% | 28.14% | -29.38% | 98.17% |
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | -3.20% | 120.24% | 86.56% | 238.53% | -32.26% | 9.45% | -51.10% | -13.17% | -6.26% | 43.13% |
Different Trading Currencies
RNMBY is traded in USD, while RR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
RNMBY:
$36.93B
RR.L:
£95.11B
RNMBY:
$3.61
RR.L:
£0.99
RNMBY:
93.16
RR.L:
11.42
RNMBY:
4.26
RR.L:
0.02
RNMBY:
6.50
RR.L:
2.38
RNMBY:
7.37
RR.L:
34.89
RNMBY:
$9.91B
RR.L:
£40.12B
RNMBY:
$2.31B
RR.L:
£10.12B
RNMBY:
-$4.66B
RR.L:
£9.20B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RNMBY achieves a -8.07% return, which is significantly lower than RR.L's -3.20% return. Over the past 10 years, RNMBY has outperformed RR.L with an annualized return of 37.98%, while RR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 17.59% annualized return.
RNMBY
- 1D
- 3.73%
- 1M
- -14.89%
- YTD
- -8.07%
- 6M
- -27.85%
- 1Y
- 18.01%
- 3Y*
- 80.02%
- 5Y*
- 78.31%
- 10Y*
- 37.98%
RR.L
- 1D
- 2.66%
- 1M
- -16.67%
- YTD
- -3.20%
- 6M
- -6.37%
- 1Y
- 56.77%
- 3Y*
- 102.10%
- 5Y*
- 58.71%
- 10Y*
- 17.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RNMBY vs. RR.L — Risk / Return Rank
RNMBY
RR.L
RNMBY vs. RR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RNMBY | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 1.64 | -1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.84 | 2.13 | -1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.29 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 2.53 | -1.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.45 | 8.69 | -7.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RNMBY | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 1.64 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.79 | 1.36 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | 0.35 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.24 | +0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between RNMBY and RR.L is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RNMBY vs. RR.L - Dividend Comparison
RNMBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than RR.L's 0.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNMBY Rheinmetall AG ADR | 0.54% | 0.49% | 0.96% | 1.46% | 1.82% | 1.72% | 1.56% | 1.36% | 1.47% | 2.06% | 2.97% | 0.53% |
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 0.93% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.71% | 1.41% | 2.99% | 1.75% | 4.06% |
Drawdowns
RNMBY vs. RR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNMBY drawdown since its inception was -67.75%, smaller than the maximum RR.L drawdown of -91.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNMBY and RR.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNMBY | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.75% | -89.61% | +21.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.54% | -18.82% | -13.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.33% | -55.09% | +14.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.75% | -89.41% | +21.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.20% | -16.95% | -11.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.48% | -39.27% | +22.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.53% | 5.47% | +8.06% |
Volatility
RNMBY vs. RR.L - Volatility Comparison
Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) have volatilities of 15.38% and 15.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RNMBY | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.38% | 15.32% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.35% | 23.20% | +9.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.99% | 34.51% | +13.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.13% | 43.08% | +1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.12% | 49.70% | -8.58% |
Financials
RNMBY vs. RR.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rheinmetall AG ADR and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RNMBY vs. RR.L - Profitability Comparison
RNMBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a gross profit of -1.64B and revenue of 2.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -68.4%.
RR.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 11.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
RNMBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported an operating income of 714.56M and revenue of 2.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.8%.
RR.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported an operating income of 3.25B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
RNMBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a net income of 324.92M and revenue of 2.40B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
RR.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a net income of 1.43B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.