KBWP vs. IYF
KBWP (Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF) and IYF (iShares U.S. Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - KBWP tracks the KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR) while IYF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KBWP returned 12.39%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for IYF. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KBWP charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYF.
Performance
KBWP vs. IYF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBWP achieves a -1.94% return, which is significantly lower than IYF's 0.92% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWP has underperformed IYF with an annualized return of 12.39%, while IYF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.90% annualized return.
KBWP
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 6M
- -2.38%
- 1Y
- 2.45%
- 3Y*
- 17.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
IYF
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 4.59%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 11.89%
- 3Y*
- 23.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
KBWP vs. IYF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF | -1.94% | 11.49% | 30.45% | 7.09% | 10.16% | 20.61% | -2.05% | 28.67% | -2.76% | 8.86% |
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | 0.92% | 18.25% | 31.30% | 15.32% | -11.33% | 31.60% | -1.00% | 31.86% | -9.39% | 19.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBWP and IYF is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2010 | 0.64 |
The correlation between KBWP and IYF shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.71 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
KBWP vs. IYF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KBWP
IYF
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
KBWP
IYF
Basic Materials
KBWP
-
IYF
-
Communication Services
KBWP
-
IYF
-
Consumer Cyclical
KBWP
-
IYF
-
Consumer Defensive
KBWP
-
IYF
-
Energy
KBWP
-
IYF
-
Healthcare
KBWP
-
IYF
-
Industrials
KBWP
-
IYF
-
Real Estate
KBWP
-
IYF
Technology
KBWP
-
IYF
Utilities
KBWP
-
IYF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBWP vs. IYF — Risk / Return Rank
KBWP
IYF
KBWP vs. IYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KBWP | IYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.15 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 0.86 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | 2.32 | -1.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KBWP vs. IYF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBWP drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum IYF drawdown of -79.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWP and IYF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBWP | IYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.76% | -79.09% | +39.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -13.88% | +4.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | -16.60% | +4.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.00% | -25.06% | +8.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.76% | -42.57% | +2.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -2.17% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.37% | -17.58% | +13.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.36% | 5.14% | -0.78% |
Volatility
KBWP vs. IYF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) at 4.13%. This indicates that KBWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBWP | IYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | 4.13% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 11.19% | +0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.60% | 14.53% | +2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 19.00% | -0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 20.84% | -0.11% |
KBWP vs. IYF - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBWP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IYF's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBWP vs. IYF - Dividend Comparison
KBWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than IYF's 1.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | 1.48% | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.64% | 1.90% | 1.46% | 1.67% | 1.66% |
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF | 2.00% | 1.58% | 1.64% | 1.68% | 1.99% | 3.02% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 2.11% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBWP and IYF have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBWP has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to IYF (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWP dropped -39.76% vs IYF's -79.09%.
On 10-year performance, IYF leads with 13.90% vs 12.39% for KBWP. On fees, KBWP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IYF has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYF has performed better with a 13.90% return vs 12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KBWP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYF.
KBWP has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.48% for IYF.
KBWP tracks KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR), while IYF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWP and 0.42% for IYF.
IYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KBWP and IYF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer