KBWP vs. FDIQ
KBWP (Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF) and FDIQ (Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF) are both Financials Equities funds from Invesco - KBWP tracks the KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR) while FDIQ tracks the Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KBWP returned 11.32%/yr vs 7.70%/yr for FDIQ. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
KBWP vs. FDIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBWP achieves a -8.05% return, which is significantly lower than FDIQ's 10.79% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWP has outperformed FDIQ with an annualized return of 11.32%, while FDIQ has yielded a comparatively lower 7.70% annualized return.
KBWP
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- -8.05%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- -6.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
FDIQ
- 1D
- -2.91%
- 1M
- -4.51%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 6M
- 13.45%
- 1Y
- 26.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.70%
KBWP vs. FDIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF | -8.05% | 11.49% | 30.45% | 7.09% | 10.16% | 20.61% | -2.05% | 28.67% | -2.76% | 8.86% |
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 10.79% | 6.32% | 12.76% | -0.84% | -7.23% | 36.05% | -8.95% | 23.57% | -18.31% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBWP and FDIQ is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2011 | 0.54 |
The correlation between KBWP and FDIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.59 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBWP vs. FDIQ — Risk / Return Rank
KBWP
FDIQ
KBWP vs. FDIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KBWP | FDIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | 1.18 | -1.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | 1.77 | -2.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.23 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 2.20 | -2.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 5.64 | -6.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KBWP | FDIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 | 1.18 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.14 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.25 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.37 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
KBWP vs. FDIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBWP drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum FDIQ drawdown of -52.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWP and FDIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBWP | FDIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.76% | -52.86% | +13.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -11.13% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | -28.09% | +15.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.00% | -42.99% | +25.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.76% | -52.86% | +13.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.81% | -7.63% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -11.56% | +7.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 4.35% | +0.43% |
Volatility
KBWP vs. FDIQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) and Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) have volatilities of 4.10% and 4.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBWP | FDIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 4.00% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.41% | 13.93% | -2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 22.16% | -5.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 28.69% | -10.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 31.12% | -10.42% |
KBWP vs. FDIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both KBWP and FDIQ have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
KBWP vs. FDIQ - Dividend Comparison
KBWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than FDIQ's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 2.53% | 2.66% | 2.69% | 2.89% | 2.51% | 2.04% | 2.92% | 2.44% | 2.45% | 1.59% | 1.50% | 1.92% |
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF | 2.02% | 1.58% | 1.64% | 1.68% | 1.99% | 3.02% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 2.11% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBWP and FDIQ have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBWP has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to FDIQ (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWP dropped -39.76% vs FDIQ's -52.86%.
On 10-year performance, KBWP leads with 11.32% vs 7.70% for FDIQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, FDIQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, KBWP has performed better with a 11.32% return vs 7.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KBWP and FDIQ have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
FDIQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 2.02% for KBWP.
KBWP tracks KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR), while FDIQ tracks Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index.
FDIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KBWP and FDIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer