KBWD vs. XLF
KBWD (Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - KBWD tracks the KBW Nasdaq Financial Sector Dividend Yield Index while XLF tracks the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KBWD returned 4.71%/yr vs 13.45%/yr for XLF. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KBWD charges 5.39%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLF.
Performance
KBWD vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBWD achieves a -3.66% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 3.26% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWD has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 4.71%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.45% annualized return.
KBWD
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- -3.66%
- 1Y
- -1.54%
- 3Y*
- 3.61%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- 4.71%
XLF
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 5.49%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- 9.17%
- 3Y*
- 19.74%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
KBWD vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBWD Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF | -3.66% | 5.59% | 4.30% | 20.21% | -19.14% | 31.89% | -15.58% | 20.72% | -8.70% | 12.06% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3.26% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBWD and XLF is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2010 | 0.73 |
The correlation between KBWD and XLF shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
KBWD vs. XLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KBWD
XLF
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
KBWD
XLF
Real Estate
KBWD
XLF
-
Basic Materials
KBWD
-
XLF
-
Communication Services
KBWD
-
XLF
-
Consumer Cyclical
KBWD
-
XLF
-
Consumer Defensive
KBWD
-
XLF
-
Energy
KBWD
-
XLF
-
Healthcare
KBWD
-
XLF
-
Industrials
KBWD
-
XLF
Technology
KBWD
-
XLF
Utilities
KBWD
-
XLF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBWD vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
KBWD
XLF
KBWD vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KBWD | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.12 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 0.62 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 1.58 | -1.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KBWD vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBWD drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWD and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBWD | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -82.69% | +24.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.05% | -14.79% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.65% | -15.54% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.74% | -25.81% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.63% | -42.86% | -15.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.50% | -0.12% | -10.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -19.96% | +12.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.79% | 5.81% | +0.98% |
Volatility
KBWD vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) is 3.93%, while State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that KBWD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBWD | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 4.27% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.53% | 11.42% | +1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.67% | 14.77% | +0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 18.53% | +1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.24% | 22.07% | +1.17% |
KBWD vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBWD has a 5.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBWD vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
KBWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.21%, more than XLF's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBWD Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF | 14.21% | 12.83% | 12.45% | 11.45% | 11.32% | 7.26% | 9.68% | 8.63% | 9.47% | 8.77% | 8.68% | 8.89% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.44% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBWD and XLF have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLF has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to KBWD (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWD dropped -58.63% vs XLF's -82.69%.
On 10-year performance, XLF leads with 13.45% vs 4.71% for KBWD. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, KBWD has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLF has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 5.39% for KBWD.
KBWD has the higher dividend yield at 14.21%, compared with 1.44% for XLF.
KBWD tracks KBW Nasdaq Financial Sector Dividend Yield Index, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 5.39% for KBWD and 0.08% for XLF.
XLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KBWD and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer