PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBWD vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBWD vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWD achieves a -5.22% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 13.16% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWD has underperformed RSP with an annualized return of 4.42%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.94% annualized return.


KBWD

1D
-0.75%
1M
-2.41%
6M
-7.83%
YTD
-5.22%
1Y
0.00%
3Y*
1.98%
5Y*
0.90%
10Y*
4.42%
ALL TIME*
5.57%

RSP

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.05%
6M
9.43%
YTD
13.16%
1Y
20.39%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
11.94%
ALL TIME*
11.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.79M$4.78M$4.61M
$1.86B$1.85B$2.06B

KBWD vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBWD
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF
-5.22%5.59%4.30%20.21%-19.14%31.89%-15.58%20.72%-8.70%12.06%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
13.16%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWD and RSP is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2010

0.77

The correlation between KBWD and RSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KBWD vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBWD
RSP

Financial Services

57.3%
14.8%

Real Estate

42.7%
6.0%

Basic Materials

-

4.6%

Communication Services

-

3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.2%

Energy

-

4.2%

Healthcare

-

11.8%

Industrials

-

14.6%

Technology

-

16.9%

Utilities

-

6.6%

Financial Services

KBWD
57.3%
RSP
14.8%

Real Estate

KBWD
42.7%
RSP
6.0%

Basic Materials

KBWD

-

RSP
4.6%

Communication Services

KBWD

-

RSP
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

KBWD

-

RSP
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

KBWD

-

RSP
6.2%

Energy

KBWD

-

RSP
4.2%

Healthcare

KBWD

-

RSP
11.8%

Industrials

KBWD

-

RSP
14.6%

Technology

KBWD

-

RSP
16.9%

Utilities

KBWD

-

RSP
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBWD vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KBWD
KBWD Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
KBWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWD Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWD Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KBWD vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KBWDRSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.29

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

2.43

-2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.08

9.43

-9.51

KBWD vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWD Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWD and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KBWD vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWD drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, roughly equal to the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWD and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBWDRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.63%

-59.92%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.05%

-7.85%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.65%

-17.81%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.74%

-21.38%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.63%

-39.04%

-19.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.95%

-1.23%

-10.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.44%

-6.61%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.19%

2.02%

+5.17%

Volatility

KBWD vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.88%. This indicates that KBWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBWDRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

2.88%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.49%

8.59%

+3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.87%

11.76%

+4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

16.16%

+3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.26%

18.28%

+4.98%

KBWD vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWD has a 5.39% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBWD vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

KBWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.50%, more than RSP's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBWD
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF
14.50%12.83%12.45%11.45%11.32%7.26%9.68%8.63%9.47%8.77%8.68%8.89%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBWD and RSP have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBWD has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to RSP (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWD dropped -58.63% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 11.94% vs 4.42% for KBWD. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 11.94% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 5.39% for KBWD.

KBWD has the higher dividend yield at 14.50%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.

KBWD is categorized as Financials Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. KBWD tracks KBW Nasdaq Financial Sector Dividend Yield Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 5.39% for KBWD and 0.20% for RSP.

RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBWD and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer