KBWB vs. TFNS
KBWB (Invesco KBW Bank ETF) and TFNS (T. Rowe Price Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. KBWB is passively managed, while TFNS is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KBWB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TFNS.
Performance
KBWB vs. TFNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBWB achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly higher than TFNS's -4.02% return.
KBWB
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 5.53%
- 6M
- 12.68%
- 1Y
- 37.99%
- 3Y*
- 32.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
TFNS
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- -4.02%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KBWB vs. TFNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF | 5.53% | 28.04% |
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF | -4.02% | 10.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBWB and TFNS is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | 0.87 |
KBWB vs. TFNS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KBWB
TFNS
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
KBWB
TFNS
Basic Materials
KBWB
-
TFNS
-
Communication Services
KBWB
-
TFNS
-
Consumer Cyclical
KBWB
-
TFNS
-
Consumer Defensive
KBWB
-
TFNS
-
Energy
KBWB
-
TFNS
-
Healthcare
KBWB
-
TFNS
-
Industrials
KBWB
-
TFNS
Real Estate
KBWB
-
TFNS
-
Technology
KBWB
-
TFNS
Utilities
KBWB
-
TFNS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBWB vs. TFNS — Risk / Return Rank
KBWB
TFNS
KBWB vs. TFNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KBWB | TFNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.48 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.29 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KBWB | TFNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.41 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
KBWB vs. TFNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBWB drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than TFNS's maximum drawdown of -14.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWB and TFNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBWB | TFNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -14.00% | -36.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -6.70% | +4.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.75% | -3.80% | -7.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | — | — |
Volatility
KBWB vs. TFNS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBWB | TFNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.01% | 15.00% | +5.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.62% | 15.00% | +11.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.20% | 15.00% | +14.20% |
KBWB vs. TFNS - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBWB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TFNS's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBWB vs. TFNS - Dividend Comparison
KBWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than TFNS's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF | 2.03% | 2.04% | 2.46% | 3.20% | 3.05% | 2.13% | 2.62% | 2.38% | 2.54% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 1.53% |
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF | 0.51% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBWB and TFNS have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KBWB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KBWB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TFNS.
KBWB has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.51% for TFNS.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWB and 0.44% for TFNS.
Find the right allocation for KBWB and TFNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer