PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBWB vs. PSCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBWB vs. PSCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWB achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly lower than PSCF's 17.94% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWB has outperformed PSCF with an annualized return of 13.69%, while PSCF has yielded a comparatively lower 7.81% annualized return.


KBWB

1D
0.20%
1M
1.73%
6M
12.74%
YTD
15.29%
1Y
36.87%
3Y*
31.95%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
13.69%
ALL TIME*
13.87%

PSCF

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.75%
6M
13.69%
YTD
17.94%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
7.81%
ALL TIME*
9.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$147.63M$184.17M$155.76M
$437.87K$392.38K$202.32K

KBWB vs. PSCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
15.29%32.05%36.73%-1.18%-21.68%37.72%-10.46%35.90%-18.30%18.11%
PSCF
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
17.94%6.19%15.50%6.02%-19.34%27.82%-9.07%23.13%-8.43%6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWB and PSCF is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2011

0.80

The correlation between KBWB and PSCF shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KBWB vs. PSCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBWB
PSCF

Financial Services

100.0%
66.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

29.9%

Technology

-

3.4%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KBWB
100.0%
PSCF
66.3%

Basic Materials

KBWB

-

PSCF

-

Communication Services

KBWB

-

PSCF

-

Consumer Cyclical

KBWB

-

PSCF

-

Consumer Defensive

KBWB

-

PSCF

-

Energy

KBWB

-

PSCF

-

Healthcare

KBWB

-

PSCF

-

Industrials

KBWB

-

PSCF
0.4%

Real Estate

KBWB

-

PSCF
29.9%

Technology

KBWB

-

PSCF
3.4%

Utilities

KBWB

-

PSCF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBWB vs. PSCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KBWB
KBWB Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
KBWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWB Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWB Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

PSCF
PSCF Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PSCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCF Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCF Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KBWB vs. PSCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KBWBPSCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

2.66

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.52

7.19

-0.67

KBWB vs. PSCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWB Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the PSCF Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWB and PSCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KBWB vs. PSCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWB drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than PSCF's maximum drawdown of -45.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWB and PSCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBWBPSCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-45.46%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.38%

-9.91%

-6.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.43%

-24.34%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.31%

-36.77%

-12.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.27%

-45.46%

-4.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-1.46%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

-8.52%

-3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.18%

3.66%

+1.52%

Volatility

KBWB vs. PSCF - Volatility Comparison

Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) at 4.47%. This indicates that KBWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBWBPSCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

4.47%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.94%

11.69%

+4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.60%

17.14%

+3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.39%

22.23%

+4.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.06%

24.74%

+4.32%

KBWB vs. PSCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCF's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBWB vs. PSCF - Dividend Comparison

KBWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than PSCF's 2.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
1.93%2.04%2.46%3.20%3.05%2.13%2.62%2.38%2.54%1.35%1.53%1.53%
PSCF
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
2.13%2.09%2.48%3.32%2.93%1.83%3.57%4.27%4.21%2.26%3.01%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBWB and PSCF have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBWB has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to PSCF (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWB dropped -50.27% vs PSCF's -45.46%.

On 10-year performance, KBWB leads with 13.69% vs 7.81% for PSCF. On fees, PSCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KBWB has performed better with a 13.69% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KBWB.

PSCF has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 1.93% for KBWB.

KBWB tracks KBW Nasdaq Bank Index, while PSCF tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Financials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWB and 0.29% for PSCF.

KBWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBWB and PSCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer