PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBWB vs. PPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBWB vs. PPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBWB achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly lower than PPA's 10.46% return. Over the past 10 years, KBWB has underperformed PPA with an annualized return of 12.25%, while PPA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.58% annualized return.


KBWB

1D
1.74%
1M
1.83%
YTD
5.53%
6M
12.68%
1Y
37.99%
3Y*
32.54%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
12.25%

PPA

1D
-0.36%
1M
4.46%
YTD
10.46%
6M
16.02%
1Y
29.93%
3Y*
29.68%
5Y*
18.46%
10Y*
17.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBWB vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
5.53%32.05%36.73%-1.18%-21.68%37.72%-10.46%35.90%-18.30%18.11%
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
10.46%37.15%25.28%18.41%9.52%7.09%0.45%39.63%-7.51%30.10%

Correlation

The correlation between KBWB and PPA is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2011

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between KBWB and PPA has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KBWB vs. PPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBWB
PPA

Financial Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

90.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

9.8%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

KBWB
100.0%
PPA

-

Basic Materials

KBWB

-

PPA

-

Communication Services

KBWB

-

PPA
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

KBWB

-

PPA

-

Consumer Defensive

KBWB

-

PPA

-

Energy

KBWB

-

PPA

-

Healthcare

KBWB

-

PPA

-

Industrials

KBWB

-

PPA
90.1%

Real Estate

KBWB

-

PPA

-

Technology

KBWB

-

PPA
9.8%

Utilities

KBWB

-

PPA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBWB vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBWB
KBWB Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
KBWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWB Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWB Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

PPA
PPA Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBWB vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBWBPPADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

1.59

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.48

2.29

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.27

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.20

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.29

6.49

+0.80

KBWB vs. PPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBWB Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the PPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBWB and PPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBWBPPADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

1.59

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

1.00

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.86

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.66

-0.16

Drawdowns

KBWB vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBWB drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum PPA drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBWB and PPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBWBPPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-57.37%

+7.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.38%

-13.71%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.43%

-15.24%

-10.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.31%

-18.37%

-30.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.27%

-43.92%

-6.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-6.77%

+4.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-9.18%

-2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.20%

4.66%

+0.54%

Volatility

KBWB vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) is 5.24%, while Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that KBWB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBWBPPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

6.47%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.42%

16.06%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.01%

18.94%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.62%

18.48%

+8.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.20%

20.63%

+8.57%

KBWB vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBWB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PPA's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBWB vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison

KBWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than PPA's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBWB
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
2.03%2.04%2.46%3.20%3.05%2.13%2.62%2.38%2.54%1.35%1.53%1.53%
PPA
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.38%0.42%0.61%0.67%0.83%0.59%0.88%0.95%0.90%0.67%1.70%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBWB and PPA have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPA has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to KBWB (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBWB dropped -50.27% vs PPA's -57.37%.

On 10-year performance, PPA leads with 17.58% vs 12.25% for KBWB. On fees, KBWB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KBWB has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PPA has performed better with a 17.58% return vs 12.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KBWB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PPA.

KBWB has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.38% for PPA.

KBWB is categorized as Financials Equities, while PPA is Industrials Equities. KBWB tracks KBW Nasdaq Bank Index, while PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBWB and 0.61% for PPA.

KBWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBWB and PPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer