PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBUF vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBUF vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBUF achieves a -11.47% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's 19.07% return.


KBUF

1D
-2.36%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
-11.47%
6M
-11.63%
1Y
-3.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY

1D
-0.36%
1M
9.64%
YTD
19.07%
6M
19.11%
1Y
36.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBUF vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KBUF and QQQY is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2024

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBUF vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBUF
KBUF Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
KBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
KBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBUF vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBUFQQQYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.49

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

3.28

-3.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.42

13.95

-14.37

KBUF vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBUF Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBUF and QQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBUFQQQYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

2.68

-2.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.25

-0.63

Drawdowns

KBUF vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBUF drawdown since its inception was -17.01%, smaller than the maximum QQQY drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBUF and QQQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBUFQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.01%

-19.05%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.01%

-11.14%

-5.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.70%

-0.36%

-16.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-2.91%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.50%

2.61%

+4.89%

Volatility

KBUF vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) at 4.21%. This indicates that KBUF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBUFQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

4.21%

+2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

11.30%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.10%

13.67%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.35%

14.75%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.35%

14.75%

-0.40%

KBUF vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBUF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBUF vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

KBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.49%, less than QQQY's 34.34% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
KBUF
KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF
8.49%7.51%3.53%0.00%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
34.34%45.34%83.34%20.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBUF and QQQY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBUF has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to QQQY (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBUF dropped -17.01% vs QQQY's -19.05%.

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 36.38% vs -3.13% for KBUF. On fees, KBUF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QQQY has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 36.38% return vs -3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KBUF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for QQQY.

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 34.34%, compared with 8.49% for KBUF.

KBUF is categorized as Options Trading, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KBUF and 0.99% for QQQY.

QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBUF and QQQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer