KBUF vs. MRCP

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

KBUF (KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) and MRCP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KBUF returned -6.32% vs 15.07% for MRCP. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KBUF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MRCP.

Performance

KBUF vs. MRCP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBUF achieves a -12.82% return, which is significantly lower than MRCP's 7.68% return.

KBUF

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -0.32%
• 6M: -16.85%
• YTD: -12.82%
• 1Y: -6.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MRCP

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.98%
• 6M: 6.94%
• YTD: 7.68%
• 1Y: 15.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBUF vs. MRCP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	-12.82%	18.04%	14.20%
MRCP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March	7.68%	14.13%	11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between KBUF and MRCP is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2024	0.36

Return for Risk

KBUF vs. MRCP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBUF

KBUF Risk / Return Rank: 6
KBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
KBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
KBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 6

MRCP

MRCP Risk / Return Rank: 85
MRCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
MRCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
MRCP Omega Ratio Rank: 91
MRCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
MRCP Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBUF vs. MRCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KBUF	MRCP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	2.08	-2.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.59	3.07	-3.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.46	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	3.14	-3.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.66	17.09	-17.75

KBUF vs. MRCP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBUF Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the MRCP Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBUF and MRCP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KBUF vs. MRCP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBUF drawdown since its inception was -21.14%, which is greater than MRCP's maximum drawdown of -10.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBUF and MRCP.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBUF	MRCP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.14%	-10.73%	-10.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.14%	-4.81%	-16.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.97%	-0.24%	-17.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.78%	-0.76%	-4.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.63%	0.88%	+8.75%

Volatility

KBUF vs. MRCP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) is 3.28%, while PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that KBUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRCP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KBUF	MRCP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	4.07%	-0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.56%	6.43%	+4.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.25%	7.28%	+5.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.22%	9.47%	+4.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.22%	9.47%	+4.75%

KBUF vs. MRCP - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBUF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MRCP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBUF vs. MRCP - Dividend Comparison

KBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.62%, while MRCP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	8.62%	7.51%	3.53%
MRCP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBUF and MRCP in my portfolio?

KBUF and MRCP have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KBUF or MRCP?

MRCP has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to KBUF (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBUF dropped -21.14% vs MRCP's -10.73%.

Which ETF is better, KBUF or MRCP?

On 1-year performance, MRCP leads with 15.07% vs -6.32% for KBUF. On fees, MRCP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KBUF has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KBUF or MRCP?

Over the 1-year period, MRCP has performed better with a 15.07% return vs -6.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBUF or MRCP?

MRCP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KBUF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBUF or MRCP?

KBUF has the higher dividend yield at 8.62%, compared with 0.00% for MRCP.

What is the main difference between KBUF and MRCP?

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KBUF and 0.50% for MRCP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MRCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.