MRCP vs. FLJJ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MRCP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March) and FLJJ (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MRCP returned 16.37% vs 14.55% for FLJJ. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MRCP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FLJJ.

Performance

MRCP vs. FLJJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRCP achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly higher than FLJJ's 5.12% return.

MRCP

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 6.51%
• 6M: 6.48%
• 1Y: 16.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLJJ

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 5.12%
• 6M: 5.26%
• 1Y: 14.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRCP vs. FLJJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MRCP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March	6.51%	14.13%	11.90%
FLJJ Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF	5.12%	11.35%	11.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MRCP and FLJJ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2024	0.94

The correlation between MRCP and FLJJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MRCP vs. FLJJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRCP

MRCP Risk / Return Rank: 86
MRCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
MRCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
MRCP Omega Ratio Rank: 91
MRCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
MRCP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

FLJJ

FLJJ Risk / Return Rank: 90
FLJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FLJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FLJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FLJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FLJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRCP vs. FLJJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MRCP	FLJJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	3.07	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	4.75	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.65	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	3.79	-0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.17	20.02	-0.85

MRCP vs. FLJJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRCP Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the FLJJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRCP and FLJJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MRCP vs. FLJJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRCP drawdown since its inception was -10.73%, which is greater than FLJJ's maximum drawdown of -6.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRCP and FLJJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MRCP	FLJJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.73%	-6.91%	-3.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.81%	-3.86%	-0.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	-0.25%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.77%	-0.77%	0.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	0.73%	+0.13%

Volatility

MRCP vs. FLJJ - Volatility Comparison

PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) has a higher volatility of 2.14% compared to Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) at 1.28%. This indicates that MRCP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MRCP	FLJJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.14%	1.28%	+0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.26%	3.76%	+1.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.36%	4.83%	+1.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.25%	6.19%	+3.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.25%	6.19%	+3.06%

MRCP vs. FLJJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRCP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FLJJ's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

MRCP vs. FLJJ - Dividend Comparison

Neither MRCP nor FLJJ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MRCP and FLJJ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, MRCP and FLJJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MRCP or FLJJ?

MRCP has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to FLJJ (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRCP dropped -10.73% vs FLJJ's -6.91%.

Which ETF is better, MRCP or FLJJ?

On 1-year performance, MRCP leads with 16.37% vs 14.55% for FLJJ. On fees, MRCP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FLJJ has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MRCP or FLJJ?

Over the 1-year period, MRCP has performed better with a 16.37% return vs 14.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MRCP or FLJJ?

MRCP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FLJJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MRCP or FLJJ?

MRCP and FLJJ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MRCP and FLJJ?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MRCP and 0.74% for FLJJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLJJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.