PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBUF vs. KOID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBUF vs. KOID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBUF achieves a -15.02% return, which is significantly lower than KOID's 26.38% return.


KBUF

1D
-0.06%
1M
-4.18%
YTD
-15.02%
6M
-15.46%
1Y
-8.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KOID

1D
-5.61%
1M
-3.52%
YTD
26.38%
6M
29.73%
1Y
61.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBUF vs. KOID - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KBUF and KOID is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

0.53

The correlation between KBUF and KOID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBUF vs. KOID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBUF
KBUF Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
KBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
KBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

KOID
KOID Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
KOID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOID Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
KOID Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOID Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBUF vs. KOID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KBUFKOIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.38

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.42

3.37

-3.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.97

11.20

-12.17

KBUF vs. KOID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBUF Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the KOID Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBUF and KOID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KBUF vs. KOID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBUF drawdown since its inception was -20.04%, which is greater than KOID's maximum drawdown of -18.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBUF and KOID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBUFKOIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.04%

-18.19%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.04%

-18.19%

-1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.04%

-6.96%

-13.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.46%

-3.41%

-1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.58%

5.47%

+3.11%

Volatility

KBUF vs. KOID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) is 4.13%, while KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) has a volatility of 11.66%. This indicates that KBUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KOID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBUFKOIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

11.66%

-7.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

21.06%

-10.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.13%

26.15%

-13.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.27%

25.84%

-11.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.27%

25.84%

-11.57%

KBUF vs. KOID - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBUF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than KOID's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBUF vs. KOID - Dividend Comparison

KBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.84%, more than KOID's 0.67% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


KBUF and KOID have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KOID has higher volatility (11.66%) compared to KBUF (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBUF dropped -20.04% vs KOID's -18.19%.

On 1-year performance, KOID leads with 61.07% vs -8.32% for KBUF. On fees, KOID is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, KBUF has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KOID has performed better with a 61.07% return vs -8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KOID is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KBUF.

KBUF has the higher dividend yield at 8.84%, compared with 0.67% for KOID.

KBUF is categorized as Options Trading, while KOID is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KBUF and 0.69% for KOID.

KOID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBUF and KOID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer