PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBUF vs. KOID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBUF vs. KOID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBUF achieves a -11.47% return, which is significantly lower than KOID's 34.14% return.


KBUF

1D
-2.36%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
-11.47%
6M
-11.63%
1Y
-3.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KOID

1D
-0.07%
1M
14.72%
YTD
34.14%
6M
42.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBUF vs. KOID - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KBUF and KOID is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.56

KBUF vs. KOID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBUF
KOID

Communication Services

40.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

38.4%
15.8%

Healthcare

6.9%

-

Real Estate

4.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.3%

-

Technology

3.6%
42.8%

Financial Services

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

5.8%

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

35.5%

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

KBUF
40.1%
KOID

-

Consumer Cyclical

KBUF
38.4%
KOID
15.8%

Healthcare

KBUF
6.9%
KOID

-

Real Estate

KBUF
4.8%
KOID

-

Consumer Defensive

KBUF
4.3%
KOID

-

Technology

KBUF
3.6%
KOID
42.8%

Financial Services

KBUF
2.0%
KOID

-

Basic Materials

KBUF

-

KOID
5.8%

Energy

KBUF

-

KOID

-

Industrials

KBUF

-

KOID
35.5%

Utilities

KBUF

-

KOID

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBUF vs. KOID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBUF
KBUF Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
KBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
KBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

KOID
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBUF vs. KOID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBUFKOIDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.42

KBUF vs. KOID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBUFKOIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

2.91

-2.29

Drawdowns

KBUF vs. KOID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBUF drawdown since its inception was -17.01%, smaller than the maximum KOID drawdown of -18.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBUF and KOID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBUFKOIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.01%

-18.19%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.70%

-1.25%

-15.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-3.35%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.50%

Volatility

KBUF vs. KOID - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBUFKOIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.10%

24.55%

-11.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.35%

24.55%

-10.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.35%

24.55%

-10.20%

KBUF vs. KOID - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBUF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than KOID's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBUF vs. KOID - Dividend Comparison

KBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.49%, more than KOID's 0.63% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


KBUF and KOID have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KOID is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KOID is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KBUF.

KBUF has the higher dividend yield at 8.49%, compared with 0.63% for KOID.

KBUF is categorized as Options Trading, while KOID is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KBUF and 0.69% for KOID.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBUF and KOID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer