KBUF vs. AAPR
KBUF (KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) and AAPR (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KBUF returned -3.13% vs 9.83% for AAPR. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KBUF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for AAPR.
Performance
KBUF vs. AAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBUF achieves a -11.47% return, which is significantly lower than AAPR's 3.82% return.
KBUF
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -3.27%
- YTD
- -11.47%
- 6M
- -11.63%
- 1Y
- -3.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPR
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 3.82%
- 6M
- 4.48%
- 1Y
- 9.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KBUF vs. AAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | -11.47% | 18.04% | 11.31% |
AAPR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 | 3.82% | 7.79% | 6.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBUF and AAPR is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBUF vs. AAPR — Risk / Return Rank
KBUF
AAPR
KBUF vs. AAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KBUF | AAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.99 | -1.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 12.12 | -12.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 62.99 | -63.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KBUF | AAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 | 4.18 | -4.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 1.73 | -1.11 |
Drawdowns
KBUF vs. AAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBUF drawdown since its inception was -17.01%, which is greater than AAPR's maximum drawdown of -5.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBUF and AAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBUF | AAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.01% | -5.99% | -11.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.01% | -0.81% | -16.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.70% | -0.15% | -16.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -0.45% | -3.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.50% | 0.16% | +7.34% |
Volatility
KBUF vs. AAPR - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) at 0.68%. This indicates that KBUF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBUF | AAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 0.68% | +5.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.53% | 1.57% | +8.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.10% | 2.36% | +10.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.35% | 4.81% | +9.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.35% | 4.81% | +9.54% |
KBUF vs. AAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBUF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBUF vs. AAPR - Dividend Comparison
KBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.49%, while AAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | 8.49% | 7.51% | 3.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBUF and AAPR have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBUF has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to AAPR (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBUF dropped -17.01% vs AAPR's -5.99%.
On 1-year performance, AAPR leads with 9.83% vs -3.13% for KBUF. On fees, AAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, AAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAPR has performed better with a 9.83% return vs -3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KBUF.
KBUF has the higher dividend yield at 8.49%, compared with 0.00% for AAPR.
They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KBUF and 0.79% for AAPR.
AAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KBUF and AAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer