PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPR vs. SIXO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPR vs. SIXO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPR achieves a 3.40% return, which is significantly higher than SIXO's 3.05% return.


AAPR

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
3.40%
6M
3.56%
1Y
9.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SIXO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.65%
YTD
3.05%
6M
3.05%
1Y
9.55%
3Y*
9.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPR vs. SIXO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AAPR and SIXO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024

0.82

The correlation between AAPR and SIXO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPR vs. SIXO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPR
AAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

SIXO
SIXO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SIXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPR vs. SIXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAPRSIXODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.86

1.38

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.48

2.32

+7.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

47.98

8.80

+39.18

AAPR vs. SIXO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.69, which is higher than the SIXO Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPR and SIXO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAPR vs. SIXO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPR drawdown since its inception was -5.99%, smaller than the maximum SIXO drawdown of -12.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPR and SIXO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPRSIXODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-12.04%

+6.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.96%

-4.13%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

0.00%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.45%

-1.99%

+1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

1.09%

-0.90%

Volatility

AAPR vs. SIXO - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) have volatilities of 1.06% and 1.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPRSIXODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

1.02%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.85%

4.08%

-2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48%

5.21%

-2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.80%

9.04%

-4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.80%

9.04%

-4.24%

AAPR vs. SIXO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SIXO's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAPR vs. SIXO - Dividend Comparison

Neither AAPR nor SIXO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPR and SIXO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPR has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to SIXO (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPR dropped -5.99% vs SIXO's -12.04%.

On 1-year performance, SIXO leads with 9.55% vs 9.11% for AAPR. On fees, SIXO is cheaper at 0.74% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SIXO has performed better with a 9.55% return vs 9.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIXO is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for AAPR.

AAPR and SIXO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for AAPR and 0.74% for SIXO.

AAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPR and SIXO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer