PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBE vs. XLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBE vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBE achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than XLU's 3.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with KBE having a 9.19% annualized return and XLU not far behind at 9.15%.


KBE

1D
-2.28%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
2.87%
6M
4.27%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
9.19%

XLU

1D
-0.43%
1M
-5.74%
YTD
3.11%
6M
1.25%
1Y
9.11%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBE vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KBE
SPDR S&P Bank ETF
2.87%12.36%23.78%5.30%-14.83%33.46%-8.75%29.78%-19.65%10.49%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
3.11%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between KBE and XLU is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.31

The correlation between KBE and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KBE vs. XLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBE
XLU

Financial Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

100.0%

Financial Services

KBE
100.0%
XLU

-

Basic Materials

KBE

-

XLU

-

Communication Services

KBE

-

XLU

-

Consumer Cyclical

KBE

-

XLU

-

Consumer Defensive

KBE

-

XLU

-

Energy

KBE

-

XLU

-

Healthcare

KBE

-

XLU

-

Industrials

KBE

-

XLU

-

Real Estate

KBE

-

XLU

-

Technology

KBE

-

XLU

-

Utilities

KBE

-

XLU
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBE vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBE
KBE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
KBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
KBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBE vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBEXLUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

0.63

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.32

0.94

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.12

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

1.00

+0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.39

2.24

+1.15

KBE vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBE Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBE and XLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBEXLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

0.63

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.54

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.48

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.40

-0.30

Drawdowns

KBE vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBE drawdown since its inception was -83.15%, which is greater than XLU's maximum drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBE and XLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBEXLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.15%

-51.98%

-31.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.63%

-9.18%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.97%

-17.26%

-8.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.25%

-25.26%

-19.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.14%

-36.07%

-17.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.38%

-7.78%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.54%

-10.22%

-17.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.55%

4.09%

+1.46%

Volatility

KBE vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) have volatilities of 5.65% and 5.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBEXLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

5.41%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.93%

11.53%

+3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.62%

14.57%

+7.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.36%

17.32%

+10.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.85%

19.26%

+10.59%

KBE vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBE vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

KBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than XLU's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBE
SPDR S&P Bank ETF
2.39%2.51%2.35%2.78%2.99%2.16%2.44%2.33%2.18%1.36%1.39%1.70%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.72%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBE and XLU have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBE has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to XLU (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBE dropped -83.15% vs XLU's -51.98%.

On 10-year performance, KBE leads with 9.19% vs 9.15% for XLU. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLU has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KBE has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KBE.

XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.39% for KBE.

KBE is categorized as Financials Equities, while XLU is Utilities Equities. KBE tracks S&P Banks Select Industry Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KBE and 0.08% for XLU.

KBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBE and XLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer