KBDU vs. KBUF
KBDU (KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF) and KBUF (KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KBDU is a China Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares, while KBUF is a Options Trading fund actively managed by KraneShares. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KBDU charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KBUF.
Performance
KBDU vs. KBUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBDU achieves a -39.04% return, which is significantly lower than KBUF's -11.11% return.
KBDU
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- 6M
- -52.02%
- YTD
- -39.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KBUF
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- 6M
- -13.82%
- YTD
- -11.11%
- 1Y
- -5.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KBDU vs. KBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KBDU KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF | -39.04% | 19.79% |
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | -11.11% | -0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBDU and KBUF is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBDU vs. KBUF — Risk / Return Rank
KBDU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KBUF
KBDU vs. KBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (KBDU) and KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KBDU | KBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.94 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KBDU vs. KBUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBDU drawdown since its inception was -64.77%, which is greater than KBUF's maximum drawdown of -21.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBDU and KBUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBDU | KBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.77% | -21.14% | -43.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.22% | -16.36% | -42.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.76% | -4.84% | -28.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.81% | — |
Volatility
KBDU vs. KBUF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBDU | KBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.68% | 13.23% | +89.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.68% | 14.21% | +88.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.68% | 14.21% | +88.47% |
KBDU vs. KBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBDU has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than KBUF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBDU vs. KBUF - Dividend Comparison
KBDU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
KBDU KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KBUF KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | 8.45% | 7.51% | 3.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBDU and KBUF have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KBUF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KBUF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KBDU.
KBUF has the higher dividend yield at 8.45%, compared with 0.00% for KBDU.
KBDU is categorized as China Equities, while KBUF is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KBDU and 0.95% for KBUF.
Find the right allocation for KBDU and KBUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer