KBDU vs. CN
KBDU (KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF) and CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) are both China Equities funds. KBDU is actively managed, while CN is passively managed. KBDU charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CN.
Performance
KBDU vs. CN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KBDU
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- 6M
- -52.02%
- YTD
- -39.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CN
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KBDU vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KBDU KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF | -39.04% | 19.79% |
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBDU vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (KBDU) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KBDU vs. CN - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBDU | CN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.22% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.76% | — | — |
Volatility
KBDU vs. CN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBDU | CN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.68% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 102.68% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 102.68% | — | — |
KBDU vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBDU has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBDU vs. CN - Dividend Comparison
Neither KBDU nor CN has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.04% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 0.78% | 4.18% | 2.09% | 0.81% | 11.41% | 14.00% |
KBDU KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KBDU.
KBDU and CN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KBDU and 0.50% for CN.
Find the right allocation for KBDU and CN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer