PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBAB vs. TSMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBAB vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBAB achieves a -48.67% return, which is significantly lower than TSMG's 75.16% return.


KBAB

1D
1.87%
1M
-3.08%
6M
-51.00%
YTD
-48.67%
1Y
-15.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSMG

1D
-1.32%
1M
1.74%
6M
55.60%
YTD
75.16%
1Y
178.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBAB vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KBAB
KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF
-48.67%-6.56%
TSMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF
75.16%163.17%

Correlation

The correlation between KBAB and TSMG is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBAB vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBAB
KBAB Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
KBAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBAB Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
KBAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBAB Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMG
TSMG Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
TSMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMG Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMG Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBAB vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KBABTSMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.32

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

5.10

-5.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.38

15.69

-16.06

KBAB vs. TSMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBAB Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the TSMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBAB and TSMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KBAB vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBAB drawdown since its inception was -78.98%, which is greater than TSMG's maximum drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBAB and TSMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBABTSMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.98%

-63.67%

-15.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-78.98%

-35.29%

-43.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.09%

-18.35%

-52.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.95%

-16.54%

-23.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.95%

11.45%

+31.50%

Volatility

KBAB vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) is 27.84%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) has a volatility of 35.92%. This indicates that KBAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBABTSMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.84%

35.92%

-8.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.20%

64.33%

-3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.50%

79.37%

+11.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.17%

84.28%

+6.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.17%

84.28%

+6.89%

KBAB vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBAB has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBAB vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison

KBAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 116.67%, more than TSMG's 6.56% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


KBAB and TSMG have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMG has higher volatility (35.92%) compared to KBAB (27.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBAB dropped -78.98% vs TSMG's -63.67%.

On 1-year performance, TSMG leads with 178.07% vs -15.86% for KBAB. On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KBAB has been the lower-risk option at 27.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMG has performed better with a 178.07% return vs -15.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KBAB.

KBAB has the higher dividend yield at 116.67%, compared with 6.56% for TSMG.

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KBAB and 0.75% for TSMG.

TSMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBAB and TSMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer