KAT vs. SPXM
KAT (Scharf ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. KAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.
Performance
KAT vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KAT
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- 6M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 3.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 8.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
KAT Scharf ETF | $571.01K | $654.17K | $709.38K |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
KAT vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KAT Scharf ETF | 3.63% | 0.85% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 5.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between KAT and SPXM is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KAT vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank
KAT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPXM
KAT vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf ETF (KAT) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KAT | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.75 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KAT vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KAT drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAT and SPXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KAT | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -5.08% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -0.75% | -1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.46% | -0.78% | -2.68% |
Volatility
KAT vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KAT | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.48% | 7.57% | +2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.48% | 7.40% | +3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.48% | 7.40% | +3.08% |
KAT vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
KAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
KAT vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison
KAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than SPXM's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
KAT Scharf ETF | 0.08% | 0.00% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KAT and SPXM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KAT.
SPXM has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.08% for KAT.
They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KAT and 0.47% for SPXM.
Find the right allocation for KAT and SPXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer