KAT vs. SPXM
KAT (Scharf ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.
Performance
KAT vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KAT
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KAT vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KAT Scharf ETF | 0.37% | 0.98% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 5.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between KAT and SPXM is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KAT vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf ETF (KAT) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KAT | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 1.56 | -1.40 |
Drawdowns
KAT vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KAT drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAT and SPXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KAT | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -5.08% | -4.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.98% | -0.75% | -4.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -0.79% | -2.41% |
Volatility
KAT vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KAT | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.48% | 8.18% | +2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.48% | 8.18% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.48% | 8.18% | +2.30% |
KAT vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
KAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
KAT vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison
KAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
KAT Scharf ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KAT and SPXM have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KAT.
SPXM has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for KAT.
They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KAT and 0.47% for SPXM.
Find the right allocation for KAT and SPXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer