KAT vs. GKAT
KAT (Scharf ETF) and GKAT (Scharf Global Opportunity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — KAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Scharf Investments, while GKAT is a Global Equities fund managed by Scharf Investments. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KAT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for GKAT.
Performance
KAT vs. GKAT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KAT achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly lower than GKAT's 4.38% return.
KAT
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GKAT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 4.38%
- 6M
- 6.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KAT vs. GKAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KAT Scharf ETF | 1.88% | 1.02% |
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF | 4.38% | 6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between KAT and GKAT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KAT vs. GKAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf ETF (KAT) and Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KAT | GKAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 1.42 | -1.00 |
Drawdowns
KAT vs. GKAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KAT drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, smaller than the maximum GKAT drawdown of -10.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAT and GKAT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KAT | GKAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -10.41% | +1.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -3.84% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -2.10% | -0.74% |
Volatility
KAT vs. GKAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KAT | GKAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.09% | 12.27% | -1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.09% | 12.27% | -1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.09% | 12.27% | -1.18% |
KAT vs. GKAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
KAT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GKAT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
KAT vs. GKAT - Dividend Comparison
KAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than GKAT's 0.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KAT Scharf ETF | 0.39% | 0.04% |
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF | 0.47% | 0.24% |